Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

April 29, 2024, 5:35 pm UTC    
November 06, 2015 11:18AM
Spiros Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
You continue to ignore the problems regarding lost distance "alignments " having to change bearing in order to arrive at their putative destinations ,and how the builders of the period would have known when and to what extent to change the orginal bearing .



> It is the edges of the shape than can be
> considered to relate to a bearing because it is
> only these shapes that are not subjective.

Your whole point is subjective ,the "shapes " are highly irregular ,who is to say what should be chosen to be considered as the intended bearing when there is no evidence to to support that there was any bearing to consider in the first place .




> Otherwise one can take any two middle circle he
> chooses, the ones that align better with his
> target choice. No way to cherry pick the corners
> because they are unique.

You are cherry picking by selecting two points from approx 100 mounds,corners at least have some common ground .



>
> How do you figure that the bearing of the two
> extremes are way off the great circle that will
> arrive at Stonehenge when according to Google
> Earth they align perfectly. Are you using
> different software and or data?

I already told you "Even if we go along with that view and measure from the centre of the two extremes the bearing is still way off the great circle that will arrive at Stonehenge " .

Measure the azimuth of these two points then compare with what is required for a great circle to arrive at Stonehenge , subtratct the difference and calculate the error.
The whole idea is fantastical nonsense but going along with the fantasy the best option is to take an azimith from the corners , and the centre of the mounds at these corners , the whole thing is so lopsided any other solution is extreme cherry picking .



if it
> aligns with Stonehenge. Well statistically there
> is a 999 out of 1000 probability that it does not.
> But it turns out that it does.

It is not only miles off it requires to change bearing to get to that point that is still
wrong .
Subject Author Posted

Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Don Barone October 31, 2015 05:52AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Don Barone October 31, 2015 06:09AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Geotio October 31, 2015 11:30AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Don Barone October 31, 2015 04:21PM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Geotio October 31, 2015 05:58PM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

robin cook November 03, 2015 08:05PM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Spiros November 05, 2015 01:32PM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Geotio November 05, 2015 04:43PM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Spiros November 06, 2015 01:01AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Geotio November 06, 2015 05:30AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Spiros November 06, 2015 08:41AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Geotio November 06, 2015 09:46AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Spiros November 06, 2015 10:35AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Geotio November 06, 2015 11:18AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Spiros November 07, 2015 08:42AM

Re: Turgai Trough, Kazakhstan

Geotio November 07, 2015 01:46PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login