Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 1:53 pm UTC    
August 15, 2011 05:05PM
From here [www.skyandtelescope.com]

Quote

So why hasn't WASP-18b already gone "poof"? Hellier's team figures that the solar-type star (spectral type F6) is about a billion years old. Yet tidal theory argues that the big planet will edge close enough to be torn apart in well under a million years. As theorist Douglas Hamilton notes in an accompanying perspective, the odds of finding WASP-18b just before its swan song are akin to "drawing two consecutive red aces from a well-shuffled deck of cards."

Conceivably, observers were indeed very lucky to have discovered WASP-18b when they did. But if that's the case, then lots of other hot Jupiters, like one dubbed OGLE-TR-56b, should likewise be wrapping up their death marches — and they're not. Perhaps there's an undiscovered second planet in the mix whose gravitational tugs are preventing WASP-18b's demise. More likely, something's amiss with our understanding of how tidal energy dissipates within the star's interior. If it's a far more frictionless process than believed — say, by a factor of 1,000 — then the planet can hang in there for another billion years.

As Jammer says, things can appear to defy the laws of physics if we do not have (or understand) all the information of a system. For example, for years blackbody radiation defied the laws of classical themodynamics physics before the advent or understanding of quantum mechanics. Basically, the observed spectrum was a hump, but the theory predicted an exponential increase in emitted intensity with increasing frequency (See diagram below).Once QM was discovered, the observed blackbody spectrum was explained fully and agreed with theory.



Jonny

The path to good scholarship is paved with imagined patterns. - David M Raup



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/15/2011 05:14PM by Hermione.
Subject Author Posted

First alignments

cladking August 09, 2011 04:23PM

First alignments

Jammer August 10, 2011 12:05PM

Re: First alignments

Sirfiroth August 10, 2011 01:20PM

Re: First alignments

cladking August 10, 2011 04:50PM

Re: First alignments

cladking August 10, 2011 04:31PM

First alignments

Jammer August 11, 2011 02:47PM

Re: First alignments

Sirfiroth August 11, 2011 08:47PM

Re: First alignments

Jammer August 12, 2011 09:41AM

Re: First alignments

JonnyMcA August 15, 2011 05:05PM

Re: First alignments

cladking August 11, 2011 08:48PM

First alignments

Jammer August 12, 2011 09:50AM

Re: First alignments

cladking August 12, 2011 10:21AM

Re: First alignments

Jammer August 12, 2011 12:11PM

Re: First alignments

cladking August 12, 2011 05:20PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login