Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CLAPTRAP ? It's a science application, basic math!
> You can still search the post I put up for you and
> I ask you to show a single step that's wrong or in
> error...
"Claptrap" is anything contrived to be self serving whether it's flowery language or the application of science or statistics.
I've seen the supposed proofs that the pyramids were built with ramps and they all start by pencil whipping the pyramid into a more workable size and then sidestepping the fundamental problems. These are whipped up to prove what people want to believe. It's easier than suggesting people ran up ramps.
No. You're the one who suggests the ramps could have taken only 5% as much work as the pyramid. Not only is this contradicted by all the evidence but there's no proffered means that they could have built the pyramid underneath all these ramps.
> Only in YOUR world, where the PT are all real and
> the titles must flow in exact translation.
The PT are as real as a heart attack. The only question is whether the writers meant the words or what we think was in between the words.
> We know
> beyond a doubt that when loads were pulled
> lubricant was poured for the runners...
No we don't. But this is beside the point. You're adding thousands of more jobs on an already overcrowded ramp and grossly overworked economy.
> On a flat supported surface! Show me anywhere
> where load stress was transfered horizontally even
>
> 10 feet, let alone 200 feet.
>
> Do you understand mastery of this art leads to the
> capstan, drive belts, even transfer of ower along
> axis... Not a single ONE of which is evident
> anywhere for milennium!
This is simply irrelevent. If they needed more torque they could increase the lenght of the handles or the bow. Tranfering this force to the business end of the drill was no more complicated than using a shaft. It's no easier to drill small holes in granite than large ones in limestone. If you think about how this could be done you'll see many things. If you simply dismiss it then you won't see them.
> Good LORD man, the greatest man made environmental
> disaster to even affect this planet is unwinding
> as I type and it is directly related to failure to
> control pressure, flow, fluid and gaseous
> mixture...
>
> And we lost control in the 21st century, yet you
> fantasize the Ae did it successfully 4,500 years
> ago!
Irrelevent.
They simply couldn't drill all the time. The shaft would act as a plug in any case.
> The first two geologists you spoke with basically,
> politely, told you your theory was unsound*.
> Clapping your hands over your ears and humming
> loudly is costing you the last shreds of
> believability this dead duck possessed.
INCORRECT.
They actually told me that there is no such thing as a cold water geyser.
[
www.youtube.com]
> imho They were't telling you there aren't cold
> water geysers..
> imho they were telling you without the geological
> activity geysers of ANY sort cannot exist in a
> vacuum!
There are thermal springs to the south of Giza as well as the other activity I've listed previously. This is very near a transform plate boundary which is turning into an expanding plate boundary. It is geologically active and there are numerous earthquakes. There was a large one in '92 and one just last year that was catastrophic though minor. Remember the cladding was stripped off G1 as the result of an earthquake.
There's no vacuum here.
____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.