cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's argue PT. No one wants to argue this with
> me because I HAVE THE WORDS OF THE BUILDERS ON MY
> SIDE.

You have your uneducated, personal interpretation of an educated interpretation of "THE WORDS OF THE AE WHO WROTE THE PTS" you are guessing these were the same people that built the pyramids.

I don't see many popes building Hoover dams.

> Everyone gets tired of hearing what the
> builders actually said instead of what everyone
> thinks they meant.

No everyone is getting tired of your constant yapping about your personal, unevidenced view of the PTs.

> ... troll?

Yes!

> ROFL
>
> I've got to admit I'm different everywhere I go
> but even I have never heard of a troll that comes
> around to get insulted. Keep trying though
> someday you might be able to get to me.

It was an observation of your tactics that fit perfectly.


> I'm sorry but I hasve a great deal of trouble
> understanding sentence fragments.

I doubt it. Lots of water from rain. Lots of evidence of water at base of pyramids.

> The one sentence here isn't really accurate.
> There is enough cohesion and friction of water to
> a stone surface that it normally wouldn't obtain
> much velocity.

So a constant 1/2 inch of rainfall over 231311.45 square feet,per side, crashes down on the base like molasses in winter? Gotcha!!! But when your made up geysers spew a single gallon of water it can move tons of blocks.

Your physics is about on par with your simpler maths.

> Even where it did there would be
> no danger of moving or damaging the large stoines
> at the bottom. It only needed to collect water
> for the time it was under construction and wear
> and tear would not be a consideration.

Blow and go but still no evidence to support your fantasies.

> There is water erosion in man made passages under
> the pyramids.

Are you talking about the voids that might have been hacked at by humans in the past that just recently got posted about? These were manmade? Why don't you just write a book on the history of Earth and everyone can just go off that.

> This implies water was flowuing
> toward the surface.

Why does this imply that? Why towards the surface vs. away from the surface? Besides it benefits your geyser beliefs, I mean.

> There is water erosion in the
> canals leading from the apron to the cliff face
> proving there was water at the pyramid base.

Why do you keep carping this as if anyone has denied water at the pyramid bases.

> > You have admitted enough times that
> > you can't read the PTs, deny the cultural
> > evidence,...
>
> Sure I can read them. Wanna talk PT?

No you can't read them. You admitted to such already. You have simply took an educated interpretaion of the PTS and twisted it to your own personal interpretation of what you think the AE should have been like and meant to say.
IOW, you brutalized the culture in order to be it's savior!

> > ...aren't concerned with what the
> > professionals say,...
>
> Of course I care. I just don't care at all about
> opinions.

No you don't care about any opinions that disagree with yours.

> Well, in all fairness I suppose you would get
> along much better with someone who agreed with you
> all the time.

Like all your other assumptions this too is wrong.

> Since your posts are turning so mean spirited
> though I do intend to change the way I respond to
> them and lean toward ignoring them altogether.

Don't get upset with the messenger who calls a spade a spade.


Lobo-hotei
lobo

Treat the earth well, It was not given to you by your parents, It was loaned to you by your children.
Native American Proverb