Oh alright I will do your research for you:
Re: No means no.
Posted by: Anthony (IP Logged)
Date: May 17, 2010 08:27AM
lobo-hotei Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe because whoever is proposing
> secret/hidden/encoded symbolism/mathematical
> knowledge needs to put forth proof they
> incorporated such ideas in the original
> blueprint.
>
> Making a wall 1000 cubits long, inside or outside
> length, means that is the length decided upon.
This is EXACTLY the point I made when I originally typed the phrase he is cherry picking from my post.
However, the MAIN point was that the wall was NOT ORIGINALLY 1000 cubits long. It was something else. I don't even remember at the moment, but the important part was that it was NOT originally intended to be 1000 cubits. It was enlarged to that to accommodate design changes, and NOT because the site had some ridiculous mathematical values it had to demonstrate.
How much you want to bet I can go to Abney Park Cemetery in London, measure the outer wall, and get some ratio that is significant to some mathematician somewhere? (Especially if I use the preferred methodology of some geomancers and claim that the ACTUAL measurements are slightly off from what they SHOULD have intended!)
Disproven Premise
Posted by: Anthony (IP Logged)
Date: May 13, 2010 03:40PM
Don Barone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay we are at an impasse. I conclude that the
> rectangles they laid out had purpose and plan. You
> claim they did not.
You're paraphrasing me again, and as usual you got it completely wrong. They did have a purpose and a plan. They were laid out to enclose the tomb of a king. That was the purpose. They had to be bigger than the elements that were around the pyramid. That was the plan.
>
> I claim that they had a predetermined size in mind
> when they started. You claim they did not.
You have provided a link to a site that says the enclosure walls show signs they were enlarged at some point. Here: [xoomer.virgilio.it]
This information destroys your premise. You provided the information and even quoted it to Hermione.
So, what is your reaction?
and there are probably a billion like these if I go through the archives.
Don Barone
"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/18/2010 09:43PM by Ahatmose.