Hello Robert,
The problem with mathematical correlations like the ones posted by Don and the others is that they do not consist of a complete proposition of how the pyramids were planned. Sure the architects of the structures might have known about them but their basic plan was a different one. Your OCT on the other hand is different. It is a interesting proposition but it has it's flaws. Clive, on the other hand although started well with the Mars - center Giza angle correlation and started working on planetary trajectories - it seems that he has given up and has started ratio hunting. At the beginning I though there was only a planetary master plan behind Giza, afterwards I discovered a different one(not mathematical), and finally looking at Crete I was led to the importance of Orion once again. But Orion does not cover everything not by a long shot. My proposition is that they had in mind these three theories and maybe at the same time being aware of mathematical constants they encompassed them in as well. This means that they were very intelligent - maybe to a superhuman level. I would be interested in hearing about what you think about this Crete - Orion - Giza correlation and how it blends in with Akhet.
P.S. Religious figures are not only related to stars:
Gods worshiped in Tanis, and Thebes: Amun, Mut, Khonsu
MYT = 40 + 400 + 300 = 740
KONSY = 20 + 70 + 50 + 200 + 400 = 740
Best regards...
Ogygos