Ronald,
I agree, most if not all plateau geometric anomalies are natural byproducts, the test for Clive and Don is can they start with a blank page and sequentially determine the entire site with the theory, remembering also that before any work the Egyptians had to have had the concept already in hand; thus we must also be presented with the logic used in conceptualizing such a plan...to what purpose and meaning would all of these 'great' lines and circles have? Do we have any other examples of this logic? I am still waiting to see all the other facts, for example these are missing;
666^2 - 500^2 = 439.9499972^2
or that the diagonal of the moon = 666 rc x 10,000 (2167.443182 miles)
It does not take much to find incredible relations; if we take the diagonal of the moon above we could find a relation to the site:
440 + 411 + 201.5 + 213 + 152 + 429.5 + 250 = 2097 rc
2097 rc divided by 666 rc = 3.148648649
Soooo, if you were a fishing type you could say that the sum of each pyramids side length plus the n-s e-w axial distances that separate their sides from each other equals 1/10,000 of the moons circumference, but... this requires faith not science to believe the Egyptian's encoded the moons circumference into the site plan, it gives us all pause to realize that relations can be found in all objects depending on the context we wish to view them with. I could just as easily find a relation in the measurements of my bathroom with the measurements of Giza and extrapolate the number of days Venus or mars orbits earth.
If all of these lines and circles drawn atop the very uneven plateau have a relation to Venus, Mars etc. then there must be a hard date since they are extracted by the number of earth days, weeks, months and years. I read in comments such things as PHI, PI and "fine Structure Constant", if the Egyptians were this advanced in their conceptualizing such a huge site over a long period of time the it is not unreasonable to expect such knowledge used somewhere else, what examples before and after Gizamids do we have of this knowledge?
Clive likes to bait everyone here with speculations, instead of presenting a systematic and comprehensive solution process. Again, I admire the enthusiastic efforts both Don and Clive put forward but very very little of it coincides with artifacts discovered in Egypt.
Best Regards,
B.A. Hokom