Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 2, 2024, 1:11 pm UTC    
April 30, 2008 08:23PM
Clive,
I did the math on this... I was noticing an anomaly... so you can ignore my previous math.

If you are facing the pyramid at a 45 degree angle, so that the diagonal becomes the base... then the triangle is 43.385-43.385-93.23 based on the petrie survey.

We aren't viewing the pyramid from a 45 degree angle, so the base of this diagonal is reduced, moving it close to 90 degrees... and this was the anomaly I picked up on.
****
On a side-note, if G2 had been 290 cubits tall, then the triangle would have been 45-45-90.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/30/2008 08:30PM by rich.
Subject Author Posted

G2...an optical illusion?

Clive April 28, 2008 10:29PM

Re: G2...an optical illusion?

MJ Thomas April 29, 2008 04:30AM

Dark waters

Clive April 29, 2008 11:51AM

Re: Dark waters

rich April 29, 2008 03:14PM

Re: Dark waters

Clive April 29, 2008 10:24PM

Re: Dark waters

rich April 29, 2008 11:24PM

Re: Dark waters

rich April 30, 2008 08:23PM

Re: Dark waters

Clive May 06, 2008 11:54AM

Re: Dark waters

Clive May 06, 2008 11:43AM

Re: G2...an optical illusion?

Dave L April 29, 2008 06:19AM

Re: G2...an optical illusion?

Clive May 06, 2008 11:56AM

Now THAT'S What I Call A Mirage!

Roxana Cooper April 29, 2008 09:55AM

Re: Now THAT'S What I Call A Mirage!

Clive May 06, 2008 11:57AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login