Fmetrol

That's the fine line we quibble over.

The cauliflowers had no knowledge a pattern existed nor was the pattern deliberately part of their development.

We can see a pattern.

Should we assume the pattern was intentional?

In the same way

The AE may or may NOT have had any knowledge a pattern (Pi, Phi, Alignment on the Solstice, etc) existed.

Any pattern that we can see may or may NOT have been a deliberate part of the Pyramids development.

Should we assume the AE intentionally laid out those patterns for a reason?

To at least some of us that would be equal to assuming the cauliflower intentionally encoded a message.

Barring the discovery of an ancient papyrus or construction model with angles and circles and grids marked I believe this long running discussion (perhaps argument is a better word choice) is unsolvable.

As I've said elsewhere, the AE didn't take pains to leave enough evidence to enlighten us on why they did what they did. It was only important to them THEY knew why they did it.
Imho the argument the pattern is the proof also argues the Divine Phi in the cauliflower is PROOF the cauliflower is speaking to us.

Jammer