cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hans_lune Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> > er, why you've been claiming that for over a
> > decade but never explain the science behind
> your
> > delusion. Can you quote Bui on that?
>
> I've explained this dozens of times a few of those
> times in great detail. It is not science it is by
> definition.

EXPLAINING is not evidence. You know this and yet you keep pretending you don't lol!




> There is ample evidence they were pulled straight
> up. The very fact the pyramid exists for all
> practical purposes showed it was done the easiest
> way possible.

opinion not evidence

They could not have built a 6 1/2
> million ton structure 480' high using low
> efficiency.

opinion not evidence


The fact that there are steps how how
> it was done and ample evidence including the ruins
> of infrastructure and the titles of the workers
> exist. The fact that every single ramp on every
> single great pyramid leads to the bases of the
> pyramids how the stones went straight up the
> sides.

??

The fact that large stones were used and
> no significant difference in the pattern of laying
> these stones related to altitude proves they had a
> highly robust means of lifting. Dragging stones
> on wet sand around corners is not robust.

opinion not evidence

The
> fact is all the evidence shows stones were pulled
> straight up but this is simply ignored. No
> evidence supports a belief in ramps. Evidence
> that is cited to support ramps actually supports a
> straight up pull.

opinion not evidence
>
> LOL.

Its a ramp dude
>
> No matter how much you protest every inclined
> surface is not a "ramp". My roof in inclined and
> I'm quite certain no Egyptian has ever teamed up
> with others and dragged a stone up it.

You could drag something up it however and it also exists unlike your funicular
>
> People believe in ramps and see them everywhere.
> No stones were dragged to build any great pyramid.

opinion not evidence
>
> If you know of any great pyramid that has been
> shown or proven not to have steps I'd be very
> interested.

opinion not evidence - it up to you to show evidence it has steps (and I believe it had steps too but we have no evidence to support it)
>
> You have no evidence for this and I've presented
> evidence against it numerous times. See this very
> post!

opinion not evidence
>
> Whatever means was used to pull them up the first
> step would work equally well for EVERY step. This
> is EXACTLY WHY the evidence shows how they were
> lifted.

opinion not evidence
>
> Remember the to of G1 that clearly shows stones
> were laid in a line after coming up the south
> side? You just ignore every argument instead of
> putting the facts together.

opinion not evidence

So, your still continue to treat your opinions as evidence while the rest of the world laughs at you for doing that.