Hans_lune Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> er, why you've been claiming that for over a
> decade but never explain the science behind your
> delusion. Can you quote Bui on that?

I've explained this dozens of times a few of those times in great detail. It is not science it is by definition.

The definition of the words "pyramid" and "ramp" do not allow a parallel line on the plan to be inclined. By definition parallel lines are parallel and almost positively prove G1 as well as all great pyramids are stepped. "Ramps" are inclined by definition spo could not be parallel to the base on the plan depiction.

> How do they show that? Now that is what they may
> have done, pull them up the side but we have no
> evidence they did that (they certainly could have)
> using man power.

There is ample evidence they were pulled straight up. The very fact the pyramid exists for all practical purposes showed it was done the easiest way possible. They could not have built a 6 1/2 million ton structure 480' high using low efficiency. The fact that there are steps how how it was done and ample evidence including the ruins of infrastructure and the titles of the workers exist. The fact that every single ramp on every single great pyramid leads to the bases of the pyramids how the stones went straight up the sides. The fact that large stones were used and no significant difference in the pattern of laying these stones related to altitude proves they had a highly robust means of lifting. Dragging stones on wet sand around corners is not robust. The fact is all the evidence shows stones were pulled straight up but this is simply ignored. No evidence supports a belief in ramps. Evidence that is cited to support ramps actually supports a straight up pull.

> They are still ramps no matter how much you lie
> about it and refuse to see. Think causeway.....

LOL.

No matter how much you protest every inclined surface is not a "ramp". My roof in inclined and I'm quite certain no Egyptian has ever teamed up with others and dragged a stone up it.

People believe in ramps and see them everywhere. No stones were dragged to build any great pyramid.

> Nope that is your personal delusion. We simply
> ignore your ignorance on this one.

If you know of any great pyramid that has been shown or proven not to have steps I'd be very interested.



> It iWe
> DO have evidence of their pulling heavy stone and
> of ramps. As noted I think they used ramps on the
> lower parts of the pyramids, they switched to
> direct hauling (as you suggest mid way) but using
> manpower, then shadoof type machines. At the start
> they did direct haul to the site (for the first
> lower tier.

You have no evidence for this and I've presented evidence against it numerous times. See this very post!

> In other words explain how they, 'pulled them up
> the side' for the first and second and third
> tier........

Whatever means was used to pull them up the first step would work equally well for EVERY step. This is EXACTLY WHY the evidence shows how they were lifted.

Remember the to of G1 that clearly shows stones were laid in a line after coming up the south side? You just ignore every argument instead of putting the facts together.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.