You continue to call the facts, 'opinions".

The existence of visible lines on the pyramid is not only a simple fact but it shows how the stones were lifted. These same lines on the gravimetric scan show the exact same thing in a different light. You can interpret evidence as you choose but not facts. The fact is that a ramp can not appear as a line parallel to the base on the gravimetric scan. The fact is there are no titles of the builders that are consistent with dragging stones. It is a fact that stones were obviously pulled up to the top of G1 and then laid east to west. By the same token it is obvious the builders mightta done it a different way and then intentionally made it appear the stones came up the south side.

The fact is every indication is the so called valley temple was actually a port and the so called causeway was actually a "ramp" .to this temple. The fact is the so called mortuary temple was the most logical place to saw the stones that arrived at the valley temple from the Turah Mines. Everything I'm saying is an obvious fact and calling them "opinion" is mere rhetoric. It is also a fact that pulling stones straight up the sides as all the evidence suggests they did is several times more efficient than building ramps and dragging stones up the pyramid. I would remind you that not only does it save at least twice as much work as building a Great Pyramid but that every "ramp" points to the bottom of the pyramid.

There was never any "study" needed to solve how the pyramids were built because the facts speak for themselves. It really doesn't matter how this was solved what matters is it was solved. It apparently was first solved by Charlie R (Charles Rigano) using nothing but logic alone. Kudos! I couldn't have done it this way probably. The method has an elegant simplicity and a very high efficiency. It is also obvious once you see it but Egyptologists are still talking about using ramps.

The presence of steps within the pyramids severely weaken them. It not only provided girdles of casing stone weakness but the steps are an internal flaw in the distribution of the massive weight. The east side would require a pretty small earthquake for the side of the second step to bulge out resulting in a catastrophic structural failure. So why did they introduce five weak steps of 81' 3"? Simply stated they had no choice. They had no means of lifting stones other than pulling them up from above. The only alternative to using a very highly efficient means to build was to build a tiny little pyramid. They wanted big so each step was the highest they could lift stones.

It's a very simple theory. But unlike the "ramp theory" the evidence and the facts fit it.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.