Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 4, 2024, 11:00 pm UTC    
September 01, 2010 11:44PM
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The best example and the most important since it
> proves the point is I[].t-wt.t
>
> This is Egyptian for carbon dioxide. Specifically
> it is gas (of) yeast probably. It really doesn’t
> matter what the exact translation is. The only
> thing that really matters is what is the referent
> for I[].t-wt.t? The word is used several times in
> the Pyramid Texts and CO2 is the only referent
> that fits in each case.
>
> 2109. The sky trembles, the earth quakes before
> the god, before N.
> 2110a. N. by the earth;
> 2110b. ’I [];.t-wt.t, thou art not enveloped by
> the earth.
> 2110c. Thy fame is by day; thy fear is by night,
> as a god, lord of fear.
>
> This one is a perfect fit. It says that CO2 is
> not enveloped by the earth (during the eruption)
> and that CO2 is a subject of learned discussion by
> day (when the wind blows) and a source of fear by
> night (when the wind slows by cooling the CO2 will
> puddle in low areas and reach fatal
> concentrations). There are other discussions
> about the “evil comings” of their Gods”. The
> great Goddess Isis is even said to sometimes have
> a bad stench.
>
> 788b. the efflux goes forth from the god, the
> secretion which comes out of Osiris,
> 788c. so that thy hands may be washed, so that
> thine ears may be open.
> 789a. This power is spiritualized by means of its
> soul.
> 789b. Wash thyself for thy ka washes itself. Let
> thy ka be seated,
> 789c. that it may eat bread with thee, without
> ceasing eternally.
> 790a. Thy going is as a successor of Osiris;
> 790b. thy face is before thee; thine homage is
> before thee.
> 791a. It is agreeable to thy nose on account of
> the smell of ’I[];.t-wt.t;
>
> CO2 is the efflux of the God. Some people can
> smell this gas but in all probability they are
> referring to the mixture of grease, natron, and
> mucilaginous myrrh that was used to degas this
> water. Sodium bicarbonate and seltzer water is
> even an old folk remedy for cleaning ears.
>
> 198a. O ’Inw-Crown, thou has come forth from him
> as he came forth from thee.
> 198b. The great ’I[];.t has given birth to thee,
> the ’I[];.t-wt.t has adorned thee;
> 198c. the ’I[];.t-wt.t has given birth to thee,
> the great ’I[];.t has adorned thee,
>
> The crown is the top of the water column. Gas
> gave birth to it and yeast gas adorns it with
> bubbles.
>
> 1503a. His head is lifted up by Re‘; his odour is
> that of the ’I[];.t-wt.t-serpent.
> 1503b. The head of N. also is lifted up by Re‘;
> the odour of N. is as that of
> ’I[];.t-wt.t-serpent.
>
> They considered CO2 a gift of the sun or an
> element of the sun. Serpents are natural and
> artificial leaks of water or gas.
>
> 1922 (Nt. 743). Thou enterest when thy father Geb
> is protecting thee.
> 1922 + 1 (Nt. 744). If (thy) father does not know
> thee, he is not alive;
> 1922 + 2 (Nt. 744). if (thy) father calls thee
> "’I[];.t," retreat, such is not thy name.
>
> If the earth calls Osiris gas he should worry.
> But…
>
> 131d. His nurse is ’I[].t;
> 131e. it is she who makes his life (through
> nourishment?); it is she who gave birth to N.
>
> It is gas that makes the life of Osiris.
>
> These are the words of the builders. It is they
> who left words that suggest that it was CO2 that
> built the pyramids. It is they who left a corpus
> that consistently says the same thing. This fit’s
> the actual physical evidence where there is no
> evidence that ramps were used to lift stones.
>
> ____________
> Men fear the pyramid, time fears man.
>
>
>
> Edited 1 times. Last edit at 09/01/10 06:49PM by
> cladking.



this is the question you are supposd to be answering...


Tommi...."Leaving everything else aside for now, could you try to make your case without any 'I believe's, or anything that only you can see in the pyramid texts."


Your non responce demands a yes or no responce to the following 2 questions...


Can you or can you not read Ancient Egyptian?

Is there any hard evidence for the existence of Geysers at Giza 4 1/2 millenia ago?


Thanks




Wawick



" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019
Subject Author Posted

The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer August 31, 2010 03:04PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Tommi Huhtamaki August 31, 2010 03:18PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Khazar-khum August 31, 2010 03:51PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 04:32PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 06:35AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 04:06PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Tommi Huhtamaki August 31, 2010 04:15PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 09:11PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 01, 2010 10:18PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 01, 2010 10:31PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2010 11:44PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 12:04AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 12:52AM

Examples of you bending PT to fit your will!

Jammer September 02, 2010 06:40AM

Re: Examples of you bending PT to fit your will!

cladking September 02, 2010 10:31AM

Re: Examples of you bending PT to fit your will!

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 10:37AM

Re: Examples of you bending PT to fit your will!

cladking September 02, 2010 10:58AM

endless flawed methodology

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 11:06AM

Re: endless flawed methodology

cladking September 02, 2010 11:32AM

endless flawed methodology

Jammer September 02, 2010 11:50AM

But Jammer...

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 01:08PM

Re: But Jammer...

cladking September 02, 2010 02:12PM

Re: But Jammer...

Jammer September 02, 2010 02:32PM

Re: But Jammer...

cladking September 02, 2010 02:53PM

Re: endless flawed methodology

cladking September 02, 2010 02:06PM

your critical theory flaw;

Jammer September 02, 2010 02:36PM

I Get It

Khazar-khum September 02, 2010 02:44PM

Re: your critical theory flaw;

cladking September 02, 2010 03:00PM

Re: your critical theory flaw;

Jammer September 02, 2010 03:20PM

thanks n/t

cladking September 02, 2010 03:21PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

lobo-hotei September 02, 2010 08:53AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 10:35AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 10:46AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 11:05AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 01:14PM

The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 02:02PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 02:39PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 02:46PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 03:20PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 11:55AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 03:30PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Tommi Huhtamaki September 02, 2010 01:53AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 10:55AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 11:02AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 11:25AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

lobo-hotei September 02, 2010 11:27AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 11:34AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 04:57PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer August 31, 2010 04:16PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 08:32PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Rick Baudé August 31, 2010 04:20PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 08:33PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon August 31, 2010 08:44PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

lobo-hotei September 01, 2010 07:59AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 01:29PM

The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 12:35PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 03:36PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Roxana Cooper September 01, 2010 08:12AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 01, 2010 10:20PM

The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 12:37PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 03:43PM

The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer August 31, 2010 04:14PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 08:40PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon August 31, 2010 08:46PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 08:49PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon August 31, 2010 10:07PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

lobo-hotei September 01, 2010 08:03AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 01, 2010 10:23PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2010 11:47PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 12:08AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2010 12:39AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 12:44PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 02:16PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Tommi Huhtamaki September 02, 2010 02:31PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 03:48PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Rebby September 02, 2010 02:40PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 05:07PM

**Thread closure**

Hermione September 02, 2010 05:36PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 12:40PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Rick Baudé August 31, 2010 03:41PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Khazar-khum August 31, 2010 03:52PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

mlpeel August 31, 2010 05:11PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 08:52PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Khazar-khum September 01, 2010 12:09AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

lobo-hotei September 01, 2010 08:06AM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2010 01:11PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 12:46PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 03:23PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 08:47PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 04:25PM

just a couple of points...

Warwick L Nixon August 31, 2010 05:19PM

Re: just a couple of points...

cladking August 31, 2010 09:03PM

Re: just a couple of points...

Warwick L Nixon August 31, 2010 10:34PM

Re: just a couple of points...

Jammer September 02, 2010 01:01PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Khazar-khum August 31, 2010 06:28PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Warwick L Nixon August 31, 2010 08:36PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking August 31, 2010 09:09PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 01:47PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

Jammer September 02, 2010 12:52PM

Re: The argument for Evidence at G1... Geysers, Ramps, something else?

cladking September 02, 2010 05:01PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.