Dave L Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anthony,
>
> seriously?
>
> How can you possibly talk about methodology when
> you were unable to accept the conclusions of an
> independently arbitrated double blind scientific
> test, and then you also started off examining Old
> Kingdom funerary architecture by rejecting the
> Pyramid Texts?



If either of those were true, I would clearly be in danger of being wrong.

Since neither of them is true, I have nothing to worry about.


>
> Its your consistently flawed methodology that
> leads to your consistently flawed conclusions.


You have yet to demonstrate a single flaw in either my logic or my evidence. That doesn't make me wrong, by the way. It means I remain right, and your argument stands as debunked.

Only you can change that by bringing evidence to the argument. We've been waiting for sixty years...

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.