I'm sure you're right that I am lifting things from
proper context and you've pointed out some specific
examples even in this thread.

I'll probably start a thread in a couple weeks if I
still think there might be any validity to this crack-
pot notion that contains many of the lines from the
PT's which appear to support the idea. If you haven't
looked by then you'll be surprised even if not convinced.

Ramps are a very plausible means for lifting about 90%
of the stones onto the pyramid. But no matter how they
are configured they would still need to fill in that last
10%. Ten percent of this structure is not only extraordi-
narily massive but it also would have to be an exceedingly
difficult to reach portion. And there's still all the
cladding that had to go on.

But I think you're beiong a little too tough on the phy-
sical evidence. There isn't much of this and it mostly
does seem to point toward some sort of water-based sol-
ution.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.