Ronald: The GOCT. Are we making (bad and inappropriate) publicity (again) for ourselves, Scott ?
SC: Whatever you think, Ronald, the fact remains the GOCT is now here and adds substantial corroboratory evidence to Robert Bauval's OCT thus I feel it is relevant to raise it in this thread.
Ronald: You never wondered IF Upper Paleolithic Man actually was CAPABLE to make such calculations ?
SC: Yes, I have wondered this many times. However, the fact remains and is there in front of your eyes - this advanced precessional knowledge exists and has been depicted for us.
Ronald: If you'd consider this thoroughly and honestly, you would admit that your theory is nonsense.
SC: Nevertheless, Ronald, the knowledge is there in those structures. It is not difficult or convoluted to see it. We have to somehow explain it. I do not think simply dismissing it - as you do - is the best way of dealing with it.
Ronald: Upper Paleolithic Man was NOT capable of making such calculations. He was just coming out of the hunter-gatherer evolutionary-stage.
SC: Wrong -
[
www.timesonline.co.uk]
Ronald: To have a time-gap in the first place, you must have a point that marks the beginning and a point that marks the end of the time-frame involved.
SC: Yes - try looking at the arrangement of the so-called 'Queens Pyramids'. These mark the beginning and end of the precessional cycle of the Belt Stars. There's your time-gap.
Ronald: No, it speaks pure speculation.
SC: There comes a point when the speculation has to stop. The correlations with Orion and the structures at Giza are quite simply too compelling to be so easily dismissed. Simple 'nay-saying' will not do it anymore.
PS - Many of the posts in the last thread we were discussing such matters were removed - for whatever reason. I have NOT forgotten your accusation that I make my ideas up 'on-the-fly'. I proved to you this was not the case. As I said to you before, an honorable person would have retracted that accusation.
SC
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 06/30/2007 07:55AM by creigs1707.
