creigs1707 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GC: No other advanced civilisation in Robert's
> theory - You are thinking of another related
> theory - Better to understand the theory first
> before criticizing.
>
> SC: Graham - one of the criticisms levelled at the
> OCT in the past was that it did not take account
> of the other pyramid structures at Giza.
The GOCT
Are we making (bad and inappropriate) publicity (again) for ourselves, Scott ?
> resolves this by presenting the 2 sets of
> so-called 'Queens' Pyramids' depicting the
> precessional motion of the belt stars (i.e. at
> maximum and minimum culmination). Now, it is one
> thing making a simple eye-to-ground representation
> of the stars from the sky onto the ground at Giza.
> However, the precession of the so-called Queens
> demonstrated in the GOCT (link below) presents a
> whole new scenario. This is not a simple
> eye-to-ground representation because the
> representations of the belt stars through the
> 'Queens' at Menkaure and Khufu are around 13,000
> years apart! Whoever created this design had to
> calculate
You never wondered IF Upper Paleolithic Man actually was CAPABLE to make such calculations ? If you'd consider this thoroughly and honestly, you would admit that your theory is nonsense. Upper Paleolithic Man was NOT capable of making such calculations. He was just coming out of the hunter-gatherer evolutionary-stage.
where the belt stars would be 13,000
> years from their own time and mark this location.
> Thus, the end point or minimum culmination was
> PROJECTED far into the future. The 2 sets of
> 'Queens' effectively present to us the pendulum
> swing of the Orion Belts stars -
> SW->East->SW->East->Sw.... flipping
> 90* each time.
No, they present us miniaturized tombs that were built for the wives of 4th Dynasty pharaoh's. The 'pendulum' is only swining in your head.
>
> You say, "...No other advanced civilisation in
> Robert's theory...". I know that Robert accepts
> the problem of the precessional knowledge and of
> its transmission over long periods of time. The
> simple fact is, however, someone at some point in
> the most remote past had to have known these
> unique properties of the Orion Belt stars to
> symbolically represent them for us on the ground
> at Giza.
I know Robert is saying that the
> 'time-gap' is closing
Nothing is closing. To have a time-gap in the first place, you must have a point that marks the beginning and a point that marks the end of the time-frame involved. Since there is no evidence of Upper Paleolithic 'lost, advanced civilizations' (the beginning point), you don't even have a time-gap to speculate with and phantasize upon.
but this does not explain
> how some past civilisation was able to know such
> proerties and more importantly calculate and
> project the positions of the star belt with the
> symbolic placement of the 2 sets of so-called
> Queens Pyramids.
This speaks advanced
> civilistion.
No, it speaks pure speculation.
Ronald.