Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 13, 2024, 1:01 am UTC    
June 27, 2007 03:05PM
Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "...What records indicate clearly..?
> "...What mathematical records DO indicate that
> other methods were used..?
>
> Anthony:
>
> If you cannot supply the evidence you claim


I did. Denying it will not make it go away.


> (IV
> dynasty didn't understand the pi ratio)


Fallacy of the negative proof. If I were to ask you to turn 37 shades of purple before you were allowed to post again, would you consider that reasonable?


> and you
> are only working on presumptions in books

No, I'm working on the evidence I presented. Ignoring it won't strengthen your argument.


> using
> your reading skills that you have indicated to
> this group over the past several days

Insults do not strengthen your case.


> then you are
> digging a deeper hole for yourself to fall into.


I'm clearing away the manure. That's not the same as digging a hole.




>
> You write of professional researchers...now try
> implement think/act like one.



Please demonstrate where I have done anything differently. Thank you.



>
> This is not a competition of who is right or
> wrong...

It is a competition of ideas. The ideas are armed with facts and logic.

Your ideas have neither, unfortunately. Your ideas don't even belong in the contest.


> it's a presentation of technical finds at
> the Giza site using simple geometry and
> mathematics.


THis is a board for weighing the evidence for alternative history. You have no evidence. Your logic is severely flawed.

If you want to draw diagrams and have people go "oooh"... try GHMB.





>
> Time to use that old math book of yours...intro to
> geometry.

My strongest subject.




>
> Also...I believe you have failed to understand the
> purpose of that ratio in the last illustration I
> posted for you.



There is no purpose of a ratio. It is the simple relationship between two numbers. It can only have the meaning assigned to it by either the creator or the interpretor. One is not free to usurp the other.

You have no theory, no evidence, and no logical argument. I see no point in continuing any discussion with you until you provide at least one of those items.

Your posts are little more than gibberish at this point. Your insults are simply pitiful.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.
Subject Author Posted

Let's pretend

Clive June 26, 2007 10:20AM

Re: Let's pretend

clem ciamarra June 26, 2007 11:22AM

Re: Let's pretend

Don Barone June 26, 2007 11:46AM

Re: Let's pretend

Don Barone June 26, 2007 12:03PM

Re: Let's pretend

Clive June 26, 2007 12:30PM

Re: Let's pretend

Clive June 26, 2007 12:09PM

Re: Let's pretend

Don Barone June 26, 2007 12:53PM

Re: Let's pretend

Clive June 26, 2007 01:15PM

Re: Let's pretend

Khazar-khum June 26, 2007 07:10PM

So much wrong here...

Anthony June 26, 2007 07:23PM

Re: So much wrong here...

Clive June 26, 2007 10:05PM

Re: So much wrong here...

Anthony June 27, 2007 09:07AM

Re: So much wrong here...

Don Barone June 27, 2007 10:18AM

Re: So much wrong here...

Clive June 27, 2007 10:56AM

Re: So much wrong here...

Warwick L Nixon June 27, 2007 10:58AM

Re: So much wrong here...

creigs1707 June 27, 2007 07:06PM

Re: So much wrong here...

Warwick L Nixon June 29, 2007 11:19AM

Modern maths

Anthony June 27, 2007 11:20AM

Re: Modern maths

cladking June 27, 2007 06:07PM

Question for the geomancing math giants out there...

Anthony June 27, 2007 07:11PM

Re: Question for the geomancing math giants out there...

cladking June 27, 2007 07:26PM

Re: Question for the geomancing math giants out there...

Anthony June 27, 2007 07:29PM

Re: Question for the geomancing math giants out there...

cladking June 27, 2007 08:03PM

You've proved my point

Anthony June 27, 2007 08:44PM

Re: You've proved my point

cladking June 27, 2007 08:58PM

Re: You've proved my point

MJ Thomas June 28, 2007 03:06AM

Re: So much wrong here...

Clive June 27, 2007 11:26AM

Assertions

Anthony June 27, 2007 11:30AM

Re: Assertions

Clive June 27, 2007 02:09PM

Re: Assertions

Anthony June 27, 2007 02:15PM

Re: Assertions

Clive June 27, 2007 02:13PM

Re: Assertions

Anthony June 27, 2007 02:17PM

Re: Assertions

Clive June 27, 2007 02:46PM

Re: Assertions

Anthony June 27, 2007 03:05PM

Re: Assertions

MJ Thomas June 28, 2007 02:28AM

Re: Let's pretend

Warwick L Nixon June 27, 2007 11:01AM

Re: Let's pretend

Clive June 27, 2007 11:25AM

Re: Let's pretend

Warwick L Nixon June 29, 2007 11:27AM

Moderation Note

Katherine Reece June 27, 2007 12:07PM

Re: Let's pretend

Joe_S July 01, 2007 03:34AM

Re: Let's pretend

MJ Thomas July 01, 2007 01:17PM

Re: Let's pretend

cladking July 01, 2007 03:48PM

Re: Let's pretend

MJ Thomas July 01, 2007 05:42PM

Re: Let's pretend

cladking July 01, 2007 03:45PM

Re: Let's pretend

Jammer July 12, 2007 01:36PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login