Settling an issue.
This has been bounced around since the onset of the Internet and people began posting their views of Giza.
The error on both sides…
Alternates are restricted, without question; to use the measures of Giza in Royal cubits and that cannot be changed. This produces many geometrical/numerical results that most do not understand.
Egyptologists are compelled to use any reason to dismiss the possibility of the Giza builders understanding higher mathematics and they should know for sure…that is what they are taught. The problem with Egyptology is that mathematics is not a prerequisite for studies…yet Giza is designed exclusively using mathematics. They also request from the alternates written proof, yet written proof is not required for their theories…a double standard.
So there you have it…who is right and who is wrong?
Let’s start all over and pretend…!
Assume that we do not know the length of a cubit…it’s lost to antiquity…but we do have Giza…it’s solid as a rock!
What is the first mathematical ratio any builder would design into this complex?
Answer is…
I think that is a good start.
Best.
Clive