Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 5, 2024, 5:04 pm UTC    
April 29, 2005 09:24PM
The difference between religious people who believe in a universal truth behind all things, and scientists who are looking for universal truths behind all things is that the scientists are finding it, and for the last 300 years have begun to understand it.

Newton, who believed in god wrote:

I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the sea shore and diverting himself and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell that ordinary while the greater ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.
Isaac Newton
English mathematician & physicist (1642 - 1727)

He was not a deist as such, as this ideology had not yet evolved, but he certainly contributed to the theory and the understanding of the universe:

"A deist manifesto to the core(probably The Rights of Man), (Thomas)Paine acknowledged his debt to Newton and declared that nature was the only form of divine revelation, for God had clearly established a uniform, immutable and eternal order throughout creation."

So you see that Science and Democratic Republicanism go hand in hand. Many religious people reject the centuries of hard grafting put in by their ancestors, and would prefer to return to a monoculture religious dictatorship based on old books of myths. This is similar to, for example, why strict muslims attack democracy. Funnily enough, Islam once lead the world in science, but the fell back due to the plague, the reconquest of Spain, and Attilla the hun destroying Baghdad.

There's only one way to go, and that's up.

Dave L






Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/29/2005 09:25PM by Dave L.
Subject Author Posted

Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 06:34AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Joanne April 29, 2005 09:23AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Sue April 29, 2005 09:42AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Joanne April 29, 2005 12:57PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

wirelessguru1 April 29, 2005 01:03PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Pacal April 29, 2005 03:14PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 03:37PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 05:56PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 06:03PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 06:11PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 06:46PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 09:01PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Pacal April 29, 2005 07:32PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 08:05PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 09:24PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Sue April 29, 2005 09:29PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 09:45PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

darkuser April 29, 2005 04:47PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 04:57PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Joanne April 29, 2005 05:05PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 05:52PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Sue April 29, 2005 07:34PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 08:08PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

wirelessguru1 April 29, 2005 08:14PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 08:24PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Sue April 29, 2005 09:16PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 09:28PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

bill barrington April 29, 2005 10:24AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 11:13AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

darkuser April 29, 2005 12:15PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

wirelessguru1 April 29, 2005 12:18PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 11:10AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

wirelessguru1 April 29, 2005 12:15PM

MOD NOTICE THREAD LOCKED TEMP.

lobo-hotei April 29, 2005 10:48PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.