Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 5, 2024, 3:11 pm UTC    
April 29, 2005 09:01PM
So what about:

"Descartes 3rd and 5th Meditations and the proof of God"

Science does not exclude the possibility of god/gods, and many scientists believe in god/gods from a spiritual point of view. What they don't believe in is daft religious theories like ID & YEC, and UFOs, and the like.

Dave L



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/29/2005 09:05PM by Dave L.
Subject Author Posted

Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 06:34AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Joanne April 29, 2005 09:23AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Sue April 29, 2005 09:42AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Joanne April 29, 2005 12:57PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

wirelessguru1 April 29, 2005 01:03PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Pacal April 29, 2005 03:14PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 03:37PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 05:56PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 06:03PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 06:11PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 06:46PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 09:01PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Pacal April 29, 2005 07:32PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 08:05PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 09:24PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Sue April 29, 2005 09:29PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 09:45PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

darkuser April 29, 2005 04:47PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 04:57PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Joanne April 29, 2005 05:05PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 05:52PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Sue April 29, 2005 07:34PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 08:08PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

wirelessguru1 April 29, 2005 08:14PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Simon April 29, 2005 08:24PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Sue April 29, 2005 09:16PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 09:28PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

bill barrington April 29, 2005 10:24AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 11:13AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

darkuser April 29, 2005 12:15PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

wirelessguru1 April 29, 2005 12:18PM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

Dave L April 29, 2005 11:10AM

Re: Does "Intelligent Design" Threaten the Definition of Science?

wirelessguru1 April 29, 2005 12:15PM

MOD NOTICE THREAD LOCKED TEMP.

lobo-hotei April 29, 2005 10:48PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.