Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 5, 2024, 10:41 am UTC    
April 19, 2005 07:20PM
Hi Alex

Alex Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I've just had a quick look at Origins.
>
> In the first paragraph I read: "Biologists
> consider the existence of biological evolution to
> be a fact. It can be demonstrated today and the
> historical evidence for its occurrence in the past
> is overwhelming. However, biologists readily admit
> that they are less certain of the exact mechanism
> of evolution."
>
> AH! I've been saying that for the last couple of
> days. There's hope for me yet
>

I haven't read all of the thread that started this, but there are a whole bunch of issues here which its too late to go into so I'll be short. Basically science is a bit like an artist painting a picture of a landscape. The science is the picture and the scientist is the painter. And the more and more science advances the more detail and sense of the whole scene you can see from the picture. But sometimes you can be so close to the painting, trying to get the minute individual blades of grass completely in place, that you miss something of the overall scene. Like Van Goughs starry sky which no one looks at and considers a photographic representation of what Van Gough was looking at when he painted it. But still we get can get an amazing impression of what it felt like for Van Gough to stand under than sky and admire its beauty. We can experience something more of the reality of the scene he was representing than if he had tried to make it a photographic representation. Its sort of like the thing that Goethe described as the difference between explaning and portraying IIRC.

What I think you may be doing is expecting science to show a picture like Van Gough rather than a photo like realism. But science does not deal with fundamental meaning and explanation. It deals with the physical mechanism and tries to get that as accurate as possible. When biologists say they "readily admit that they are less certain of the exact mechanism of evolution, they are talking about the fact that the blades of grass may be leaning slightly more to the left, or that tree may have slightly more leaves. What the creationists do is they say no that tree is not on the left, its on the right. They do that because they expect the picture to present something its never going to. But the scientists are only trying to present an accurate as possible picture of the scene in front of them. They are not replicating the whole landscape and everything in it. The birds that fly across the canvas are not living paint. It shows the birds form and hints at how they move and where they came from.

When someone suggested to the old pope that evolution was just an hypothesis he smiled and replied "Its more than just an hypothesis!". I'm reading the old popes latest book right now and he was a very scientific and philosophical thinker, although this is his most informal book so far. But just because he knew and accepted the science on things, he had an amazingly profound understanding of the deepest things there are behind everything, and gods involvement in them. The creationists set up this false idea that the scientists are twisting things because they deliberately don't want people to believe in god. But thats a product of their fear and of their misunderstanding of both science and theology. And they confuse many people by making it seem like science and theology are the same thing. If you have faith, I cannot see how understanding the process of evolution better is anything less than amazing. This is how science started, to try and understand gods works better. What it should have done is raised our understanding from god as micro-manager, to something even more profound and awesome. But because these people stick to their view of god as the micro manager, almost like a human that made adam and eve like a child makes a snowman, it helps make people come to the mistaken belief that science should describe theology.

This is a better explanation of the theology;

Quote

Matthew 8:8-10
8The centurion replied, “Lord, I do not deserve to have you come under my roof. But just say the word, and my servant will be healed. 9For I myself am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. I tell this one, ‘Go,’ and he goes; and that one, ‘Come,’ and he comes. I say to my servant, ‘Do this,’ and he does it.”

10When Jesus heard this, he was astonished and said to those following him, “I tell you the truth, I have not found anyone in Israel with such great faith.

Simon
Subject Author Posted

How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Anonymous User April 19, 2005 01:12PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Joanne April 19, 2005 01:35PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 19, 2005 03:10PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 19, 2005 04:22PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 19, 2005 04:47PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 19, 2005 05:19PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 19, 2005 05:46PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Anonymous User April 19, 2005 07:14PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

bernard April 19, 2005 09:25PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 07:44AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Joanne April 20, 2005 08:01AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 08:12AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 09:03AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 09:28AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 09:38AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 01:25PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Joanne April 21, 2005 10:10AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 01:23PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 19, 2005 04:38PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Stephen Tonkin April 19, 2005 04:55PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 19, 2005 05:33PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 19, 2005 05:59PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 19, 2005 06:24PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 19, 2005 06:54PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 19, 2005 08:51PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Anonymous User April 19, 2005 07:47PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Stephen Tonkin April 20, 2005 12:37AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Anonymous User April 20, 2005 04:23AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Stephen Tonkin April 20, 2005 07:57AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Katherine Reece April 19, 2005 05:19PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 19, 2005 05:29PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

bernard April 19, 2005 09:32PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 19, 2005 10:04PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Anonymous User April 19, 2005 05:31PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Katherine Reece April 19, 2005 05:39PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 19, 2005 07:20PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Anonymous User April 19, 2005 08:25PM

No replies please

Katherine Reece April 19, 2005 08:51PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

darkuser April 19, 2005 05:33PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 19, 2005 05:51PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Anonymous User April 20, 2005 06:22AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Sue April 20, 2005 06:53AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

bernard April 20, 2005 11:21AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 01:24PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 01:38PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 02:24PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 02:40PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 05:15PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 05:53PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Katherine Reece April 20, 2005 05:57PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 06:02PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 06:12PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 06:09PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 06:37PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 06:42PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 06:58PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 07:12PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 07:22PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 07:34PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 06:55PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 07:18PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 08:28PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 08:48PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 09:21PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 09:50PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 10:18PM

Mod Note

Mercury Rapids April 21, 2005 01:56AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 21, 2005 08:26PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

darkuser April 21, 2005 08:34AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 21, 2005 09:34AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

darkuser April 21, 2005 09:47AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 21, 2005 10:49AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 21, 2005 11:51AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 21, 2005 02:53PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 21, 2005 05:25PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 21, 2005 08:14PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 22, 2005 11:43AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 22, 2005 12:55PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 22, 2005 01:41PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 23, 2005 08:58AM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 23, 2005 01:25PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

darkuser April 21, 2005 01:17PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 21, 2005 02:56PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

bernard April 20, 2005 05:11PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 05:34PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Dave L April 20, 2005 05:40PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

wirelessguru1 April 20, 2005 05:55PM

Re: How and When Does a Theory Become a Fact?

Simon April 20, 2005 09:01PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login