> > "Also, since the code for the DNA is the same for all living things, then it directly
> > suggests that a common programming technique is used to program all living reality... "
>
> Yes it does, that's exactly what Darwin observed, and he realised that the programming
> mechanism...
..and "precisely" what is the "programming mechanism"!?
> ...was the mechanism of evolution.
Clearly evolution looks like a change in
code , but the specific processes in terms of how that code changes and/or is re-programmed is what is not clearly explained by DE within reasonable and straight forward logic!!!
> It was subsequently confirmed that the programming operating system was the DNA string.
First of all, the DNA string to a wave/information theorist like me looks much more like two cross polarized encoded waves (that create a 3D space) and
not as an operating system. Thaty would make it more like part of a network and/or communications system rather than an operating system!
Dave do you know what an operating system is?
> Through billions of gradual itterations, tests, failures and successes, the program has
> refined itself, multiplied itself, and improved itself in millions of different directions.
That is just an "abstract" statement that is pretty much meaningless to me!!!
First, all evidence suggests that programs don't just refine themselves without programmers. If that was the case I would just fire or let go all of my programmers that are right now programming my various virtual reality spaces! LOL
Second, when a program is in execution (running) it provides feedback to the programmer(s) in terms of how it (the code) is working, error conditions, infinite loops, crash modes, etc, etc, but the code is usually changed
off line and not necessarily when in execution mode...
In terms of the number of itterations, maybe you are confusing execution with programming!!!
-wirelessguru1