Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 3:22 am UTC    
March 07, 2005 11:41PM
> Not at all - EM travels at c in the vacuum of spacetime.

First of all EM does NOT exactly travel, so that is a LIE!

Specifically, it is only energy transfers and energy conversions what is taking place... Also "c" is only relevant in 3D...

So, if I could convert info/data to extremely low "outer space" frequencies, as an example, then I would be able to achieve immediate connectivity...just like why are sonars are used in water...

I can also forsee connectivity through inner space in terms of re-mapping energy...

In other words, if the core of our galaxy (or any galaxy!) broke down, then it would NOT take "light years" for the information/data, about such breakdown, to be communicated across the entire galaxy...Gravity is that low frequency wave...

Either case, what exactly is the "vaccum of spacetime"? To me that is a senseless statement!!!

It is like saying the vaccum of inner space between the electrons and the nucleus...If we could shrink to that very small size!!!

> You would never live to see any EM signal crossing between galaxies.

This way there would be no UFOs either! LOL

Either case, I have no idea what is that suppose to mean!? I suppose that you must have some crazy mental picture of what outer space is in your mind and then you are trying to express it!

> So even though you keep saying "that is my point" I have no idea what you mean.

I mean that in true reality, stuff is NOT actually moving per say in the physical sense of it moving! Energy conversions and energy transfers is what is actually taking place...Like the water is only going up and down when the wave passes...

So, essentially, you are believing the physical illusion because of your senses and then generalizing it across all space-time...

But since the body and object is indeed moving according to one's senses, then there is a good reason to genetalize it, I suppose...

I guess, beam me up Scottie is not in the cards for you! LOL

eom
Subject Author Posted

big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 04:07AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 04:21AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 04:34AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 04:36AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 04:43AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 04:55AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 04:56AM

Re: big bang theory

Tommi Huhtamaki March 07, 2005 05:12AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 05:16AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 05:23AM

Re: big bang theory

Tommi Huhtamaki March 07, 2005 05:25AM

Re: big bang theory

Anonymous User March 07, 2005 10:40AM

...but an important difference

Simon March 07, 2005 11:05AM

Re: ...but an important difference

laura March 07, 2005 11:34AM

Re: ...but an important difference

Simon March 07, 2005 12:33PM

Re: ...but an important difference

laura March 07, 2005 02:58PM

Re: big bang theory

wirelessguru1 March 07, 2005 01:00PM

Re: big bang theory

Stephen Tonkin March 07, 2005 07:20AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 07:24AM

Re: big bang theory

Stephen Tonkin March 07, 2005 07:30AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 07:34AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 07:38AM

Re: big bang theory

Stephen Tonkin March 07, 2005 07:39AM

Re: big bang theory

MikeS March 07, 2005 05:04AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 05:06AM

Re: big bang theory

MikeS March 07, 2005 05:18AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 05:20AM

Re: big bang theory

Tommi Huhtamaki March 07, 2005 05:29AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 05:50AM

Re: big bang theory

Tommi Huhtamaki March 07, 2005 05:56AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 05:59AM

Re: big bang theory

Stephen Tonkin March 07, 2005 07:35AM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 07, 2005 06:51AM

Re: big bang theory

darkuser March 07, 2005 07:15AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 07:45AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 07:51AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 07:53AM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 07, 2005 08:07AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 08:11AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 07:52AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 07:57AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 08:01AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 08:05AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 08:06AM

its like time

laura March 07, 2005 08:06AM

Re: its like time

Simon March 07, 2005 08:41AM

Re: its like time

laura March 07, 2005 11:29AM

Re: its like time

laura March 07, 2005 11:31AM

Re: its like time

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 11:57AM

Re: its like time

Simon March 07, 2005 12:15PM

Re: its like time

laura March 07, 2005 03:03PM

Re: its like time

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 03:06PM

Re: its like time

wirelessguru1 March 07, 2005 03:11PM

Re: its like time

Simon March 07, 2005 05:07PM

Re: its like time

wirelessguru1 March 07, 2005 06:52PM

Re: its like time

Simon March 07, 2005 07:25PM

Re: its like time

wirelessguru1 March 07, 2005 07:36PM

Re: its like time

Simon March 07, 2005 08:10PM

Re: its like time

wirelessguru1 March 07, 2005 08:33PM

Re: its like time

Simon March 07, 2005 08:41PM

Re: its like time

wirelessguru1 March 07, 2005 11:41PM

Re: its like time

Simon March 08, 2005 02:34PM

can i just....

darkuser March 08, 2005 03:18PM

Re: can i just....

Simon March 08, 2005 03:56PM

LOL!!! (n/t)

Tommi Huhtamaki March 08, 2005 04:10PM

Re: LOL!!! (n/t)

laura March 08, 2005 04:16PM

......

darkuser March 08, 2005 04:18PM

Re: ......

Simon March 08, 2005 05:56PM

Re: ......

wirelessguru1 March 08, 2005 06:22PM

Re: ......

Simon March 08, 2005 06:50PM

Re: ......

Anonymous User March 08, 2005 07:56PM

Re: ......

Simon March 08, 2005 09:34PM

Re: ......

darkuser March 08, 2005 09:40PM

Re: ......

Simon March 08, 2005 09:49PM

Re: ......

Anonymous User March 09, 2005 07:04PM

Re: ......

Simon March 10, 2005 09:03AM

Re: ......

wirelessguru1 March 09, 2005 07:36PM

Re: ......

Simon March 10, 2005 08:05AM

Senses and energy processing

wirelessguru1 March 14, 2005 03:15PM

Re: ......

wirelessguru1 March 09, 2005 12:06AM

Re: can i just....

wirelessguru1 March 08, 2005 05:39PM

Re: its like time

darkuser March 07, 2005 12:24PM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 07, 2005 08:16AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 08:19AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 08:22AM

Re: big bang theory

Mercury Rapids March 07, 2005 08:24AM

Re: big bang theory

laura March 07, 2005 08:29AM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 07, 2005 08:30AM

Re: big bang theory

wirelessguru1 March 07, 2005 12:39PM

Re: big bang theory

MikeS March 07, 2005 06:03PM

Re: big bang theory

wirelessguru1 March 07, 2005 07:03PM

Re: big bang theory

Anonymous User March 10, 2005 10:48AM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 10, 2005 12:24PM

Re: big bang theory

bernard March 10, 2005 01:05PM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 10, 2005 04:06PM

Re: big bang theory

bernard March 10, 2005 05:50PM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 11, 2005 10:47AM

Re: big bang theory

bernard March 11, 2005 12:32PM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 14, 2005 07:33AM

Re: big bang theory

bernard March 14, 2005 02:25PM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 14, 2005 03:42PM

Re: big bang theory

wirelessguru1 March 14, 2005 04:36PM

Re: big bang theory

bernard March 14, 2005 06:25PM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 14, 2005 08:37PM

Re: big bang theory

darkuser March 12, 2005 03:51PM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 14, 2005 07:43AM

Re: big bang theory

darkuser March 14, 2005 09:13PM

Re: big bang theory

Simon March 15, 2005 07:57AM

Re: big bang theory

bernard March 10, 2005 05:57PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login