<HTML>Hi Joe,
Well the scenario is clear. Chris posted this thread himself. The other threads on this board have been posted by Duncan and Garrett(2). These posts were from co-founders of this site. What are you saying? That the "alternative camp" shouldn't respond? Only posts in support of Chris should be allowed?
There is a very real perception that the programme was biased. The Bsc upheld a complaint against the programme. To be fair I've seen programmes like the Myths of Mankind which are largely "alternative" and exclude "orthodox" responses. Thats not the point here as this programme was the flagship Horizon of the BBC and was an investigation into the evidence for a LC. and did not include or present all the evidence/arguments imo.
Anyway what's with all all this understanding/sympathy for Chris? He's produced a programme that has attracted acclaim, criticism, attention and controversy all over the world. He might enjoy the discussions!
John</HTML>
