<HTML>> if his efforts do indeed
> bring closure for some (many) people who come to him because
> they are indeed still emotionally unsettled, one has to ask
> the question "To whom is it more important to be right...
> those that are skeptical and want to verify their skeptical
> outlook, or those who will be able to go on with their lives
> normally because he helps them over that hurdle of emotional
> closure"?
Does he bring closure? Has this been documented?
Are skeptics only interested in re-affirming their worldview, or are they genuinely interested in trying to counter the spread of hocus-pocus and twaddle in the public forum?
On the issue of motives, is it right that someone uses mentalist trickery to lie to people about their dead relatives (when he gets "hits") and makes his living from such lying?
There are other ethical/philosophical issues in there too.
Garrett</HTML>