Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 11:21 pm UTC    
June 15, 2023 11:05AM
JonnyMcA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I think using the more
> prosaic "intentional cut marks" phrasing is better
> than saying carved.

Agreed!

> The real, and interesting question of course is
> what was the intention of the cut marks, and are
> they actually decorative, symbolic or utilitarian?

Or the reult of some child idly playing with a sharp stone or some such.

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at


Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me
Subject Author Posted

Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

Hermione June 07, 2023 03:22AM

Re: Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

Hermione June 07, 2023 03:25AM

Re: Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

Byrd June 07, 2023 07:46PM

Re: Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

Ahatmose June 09, 2023 01:53PM

Re: Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

Hermione June 10, 2023 10:40AM

Re: Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

JonnyMcA June 14, 2023 08:52AM

Re: Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

Hermione June 14, 2023 10:22AM

Re: Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

JonnyMcA June 15, 2023 10:27AM

Re: Boxford wood carving is 6,000 years old

Hermione June 15, 2023 11:05AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login