<HTML>Why, thank you Sandy.
That's as perfectly helpful as a Margaret Morris response. You must be using her "How to Completely Muddy a Conversation" Rulebook.
Here's a reference for you...
Einstein, 1951. Hawking, 1983. Gates, 1994. Buffett, 1996.
Since my people are FAR more intelligent and successful than YOUR people, we have clearly shown where MY argument is FAR better, and you have totally lost this round of the debate.
Hey, I like this argument style. It requires absolutely no work, no effort, no intelligence, and no knowledge of the topic at hand. We just throw out names of people. Kinda like professional wrestling, only the people we name don't even have to get involved.
Now, however, if you want to answer the question FOR Ms. Morris, why don't you SHOW me where she references the the breakdown of the limestone... the famed "disaggregation" process that only works when Davidovits puts the stones in a ziploc bag, but doesn't work when it rains on the pyramids or in the quarries.
Why?
Because there IS no explanation for this. It's ANOTHER "stake through the heart" of the geopolymer theory.
And while we're at it, I'd like to bring up the Sphinx Temple itself. As you are aware, there are 200 ton stones in the sphinx temple which were quarried, transported, and positioned RIGHT SMACK DAB in the middle of the pyramid building age of the 4th dynasty.
Is it hers/yours/his contention that THESE blocks were also made of geopolymer? It seems that if you're gonna do it with a 2 ton stone, you BETTER 'N HELL do it with a 200 TON stone, doesn't it?
(message edited by Moderator)
So, let me get this straight...
They used geopolymers to build little blocks in the pyramid, but they had the technology and the capacity to build with 200 ton blocks in the Sphinx Temple. Simultaneously.
Seems to me we have... again... shown where this geopolymer thing is complete idiocy, promoted by somebody who named his company after the theory, and argued by a public relations person who does nothing but quote data, often irrelevant, and sometimes out of context, in order to appear to keep a VERY dead theory alive.
Thanks for ... well, actually, Sandy, you did nothing.
Anthony</HTML>
