<HTML>Margaret Morris has not presented good info or data to address the deathblows to the geopolymer theory.
Period.
If you can't see that, then I am afraid the word "dense" has been severely misdirected.
Oh, I'm not saying that the stuff she puts out isn't all groovy and cool and technical...
Unfortunately, it's all <b>IRRELEVANT</b> when it doesn't address the facts that DESTROY the geopolymer theory. Destory it, Sandy. Dead. No longer a possibility. A complete waste of time discussing it. All the microscopic "evidence" in the world isn't going to help if she or David, her boss, can't explain simple things like disaggregation without pulverization -- or pulverization without shell damage.
What is your loyalty to a faulty theory with entirely ridiculous claims of validity? I thought you were smarter than that.
What, are you on Davidovits' payroll, too?
The theory is dead, Sandy. Just like flat earth and spontaneous generation. It needs to be tossed out.
Period, Sandy. Period.
I may be wrong, but I'm not dense. If you know the answer to these questions, than why don't you spit them out?
Simple answer to that one, too... there is no answer because the theory is pure, unadulterated, unquestionable bunk.
Clearly yours,
Anthony
"The clouded mind sees nothing."</HTML>
