Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 2, 2024, 11:32 pm UTC    
August 29, 2001 04:01AM
<HTML>Let's start. As you can see from Klemms "Steine und Steinbrüche..." they have identified the quarries for the pyramid blocks by chemical fingerprints. They used, like for the Memmnos Colossi phase-diagrams in which they measured the ratio between several trace elements: Sr/Mg, Sr/Rb, Zn/Cu/Pb, Mn/Co/Ni.

Due to this method they could identify 3 of the 4 quarries used for the great pyramid, 2 of the 3 for Kaphere (the 3rd is identical to the yet not foud 4th for Chufu) and the single used Menkaure-quarry.

When you go to the quarry regions you will soon see that the layers of soft rock are thin and relatively untouched, whereas the hard rock was quarried massively. From the simple numbers (volume of the pyramid compared with the volume of the quarries) you can see, too, that the only possible source for the stones or "compounds" are the layers of hard stones.

Now I have here several stones from the Giza-quarries. 5 from different regions from the main quarry, 3 from the Kaphere-quarry on the north-west-side of this pyramid, 3 from the Menkaure-quarry.

These stones are HARD. They have no intentions to break apart in water, regardles how hard I shake them in a plastic bag filled with water.

So the stones must have been pulverized some way. And here are the questions:

- How was this done? Because there are no breccia in the pyramid blocks the stones must have been pulverized down to the microfossil level

- Why aren't the fossils shattered?

- How long do you think it would need for 6 men to pulverize 2.5 tons of stone?

- When the Egyptians could pound this amount of material to dust, why is it harder to pulverize only the material in the trenches between blocks in the quarry?

- What is the advantage of pulverizing Millions of tons of stones compared with pulverizing only small trenches and break out the stone to transport it?

- What is the advantage of carrying wet mud against pulling a sled? (physics: 14 men can pull 2.5 tons with ease, to carry the same weight you need 50 men). And if sleds were used to transport the mud: Where is the advantage over transporting whole blocks???

FD</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

1st question to Mrs. Morris

Frank Doernenburg August 29, 2001 04:01AM

Re: 1st question to Mrs. Morris

Margaret Morris August 29, 2001 10:41AM

TRANSLATION:

Anthony August 29, 2001 09:33PM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Margaret Morris August 30, 2001 12:24PM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Anthony August 30, 2001 04:01PM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Margaret Morris August 31, 2001 11:15AM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Frank Doernenburg August 31, 2001 11:35AM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Sandy J. Perkins August 31, 2001 09:20PM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Frank Doernenburg September 01, 2001 04:12AM

Note for Sandy

Anthony September 01, 2001 08:04AM

Re: Note for Sandy

Sandy J. Perkins September 01, 2001 08:52PM

Re: Note for Sandy

Anthony September 01, 2001 09:02PM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Martin Stower September 01, 2001 04:42PM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Sandy J. Perkins September 01, 2001 08:57PM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Frank Doernenburg September 02, 2001 07:58AM

In Sandy's defense...

Anthony September 02, 2001 08:22AM

Re: In Sandy's defense...

Martin Stower September 03, 2001 02:38PM

Re: TRANSLATION:

Martin Stower September 03, 2001 03:00PM

References?

Anthony September 01, 2001 08:05AM

Re: References?

Sandy J. Perkins September 01, 2001 09:03PM

Re: References?

Anthony September 02, 2001 06:38AM

Re: References?

Sandy J. Perkins September 02, 2001 01:31PM

Re: References?

Anthony September 02, 2001 07:54PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login