<HTML>To add this all up, I see no real argument, pro/con, for the intent of each post, [Avry & Garrett] in context. I see the lack of "political correctness" in both+. The discussion was focused more on what was "not stated" or forgotten or otherwise excluded for unknown reasons.
So, it still boils down to;
Interpretation= an opinion= a guess;
Belief= confidence in the unproven/unprovable= a guess.
While "absolute confirmation" may exist, the public ends up with "some one's guess" which is printed as "absolute fact" in far too many text books.
When text book Editors say, "PRINT", they are also guessing, on all previous guesses. [To "assume" is to guess]
Who critiques the critic?
I guess this is enough.
KRs,,,I guess,,,Deano</HTML>
