Graham Chase Wrote (in reply to Khazar-khum):
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yours "You are taking something which already
> exists & then looking for a mathematical
> reason, a geometric proof that will expain
> everything away."
>
> Mine : yes that is fair comment
...

> Mine : You havn't shown 'why' anything. Giza was
> laid down by people who were skilled at building
> in stone, from a plan, which they followed. They
> were skilled in geometry and translating it into
> stone. We have tried to discover the plan from the
> physical evidence of what was built.

You've accepted Khazar-khum's comment:

"You are taking something which already exists & then looking for a
mathematical reason, a geometric proof that will expain everything away."

Then you state:

"We have tried to discover the plan from the physical evidence of what was
built."

The obvious points are:

1. You've claimed to have a mathematical proof. However, you can't show how it would fit any of the definitions on the Wikipedia page.

2. Why should there be a "plan", and why should it involve the pyramids alone?

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me