>
> Wrong !
> Geometry is geometry.
> It was part of the AE culture anyway.
>
> Graham Chase
>

And this is why you are running into problems.

You are taking something which already exists & then looking for a mathematical reason, a geometric proof that will expain everything away.

If your theory was correct, you'd have the formulae from AE & then go around applying it until you found the monuments/sites that fit. Instead you are taking the monuments and playing with math until you get something that more or less fits.

And I get the feeling that if the Queen's pyramids didn't fit the theory, they'd be tossed out and various mastabas, temples & walls would be employed instead.

This is why you can't divorce culture from science when dealing with a sacred site. If you know nothing about a people, their culture & beliefs, you can too easily fall int the trap of assuming tht they were just like us & believed the same things, and that the same things mattered to them that matter to us. This is a very dangerous path to take--it will lead you into all sorts of unsupported fantasy.