Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 1:40 pm UTC    
August 13, 2001 06:08PM
<HTML>This is an important consideration.

Even those reading the intro may be left in doubt. Hancock's position statement does not address all the arguments in favour of the forgery in the main body of the text. I've noticed that people often find it difficult to shake the impression that these arguments made on them - including some who've read the position statement. A potential remains for confusion at least - IMHO.</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Hancock's Libel Claim

Jason August 12, 2001 11:52AM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Katherine Reece August 12, 2001 12:05PM

Hancock called me names

Jason August 12, 2001 12:52PM

Re: Hancock called me names

Jason August 12, 2001 01:19PM

Now,now Jason

D.Przezdziecki August 12, 2001 06:16PM

Re: Now,now Jason

Mikey Brass August 12, 2001 06:38PM

Re: Now,now Jason

Peter Vanderzwet August 12, 2001 07:46PM

Lets not forget....

Derek Barnett August 12, 2001 01:12PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

John Wall August 12, 2001 03:04PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Martin Stower August 12, 2001 03:53PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Martin Stower August 12, 2001 04:49PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Claire August 13, 2001 05:16PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Martin Stower August 13, 2001 05:27PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Claire August 13, 2001 05:48PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Mikey Brass August 13, 2001 05:53PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Martin Stower August 13, 2001 06:08PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Claire August 14, 2001 02:56AM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Martin Stower August 14, 2001 04:35AM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Claire August 14, 2001 02:50AM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

penny August 13, 2001 09:50PM

Re: Hancock's Libel Claim

Claire August 14, 2001 03:00AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login