<HTML>Garrett wrote:
>
> I was not being misleading, Don: I included a link to
> Schoch's entire article (which is disingenuous in the extreme
> -- it adlects Colin Reader's highly critical article as
> "support" for Schoch's thesis: Reader does not support Schoch
> or lend his idea any credence). In any case, I was
> particularly interested in highlighting how little Schoch
> knows about ancient history, even those periods which are
> very well documented (such as the Roman period).
>
> GF
The debate is not about history - it is about whither or not the weathering on the sphinx is indicative in a geological manner of a date older than the conventional one.
Best Regards,
Dave</HTML>
