Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen

Home

Discussion Forums

Papers

Authors

Web Links

May 14, 2024, 7:17 pm UTC

In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic

Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In

Ancient History • Ancient Egypt • Laboratory • Humanities • Apocalypse • Paper Lens • Coffee Shop
Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology

Anthony

July 22, 2001 06:37PM

<HTML>Sandy:

Not bad for a guy running an IBM 286.

I thought she said salt. Perhaps it was sodium carbonate or something like that.

So, let me get this straight...

Any geopolymer would be necessarily brittle?

It could have a similar chemical composition, but could be completely "STRUCTURALLY" different?

If this is the case, then no wonder we've never been allowed to examine a piece of Davidovits' geopolymer up close...

Anthony</HTML>

Reply Quote

Subject	Author	Posted
Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Margaret Morris	July 21, 2001 11:11PM
Help I'm a prisoner in a time warp	Don Holeman	July 21, 2001 11:17PM
yes, indeed	Katherine	July 22, 2001 12:54AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Bob (trailmarker)	July 02, 2002 09:41AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Anthony	July 22, 2001 02:46AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Frank Doernenburg	July 22, 2001 04:07AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Frank Doernenburg	July 22, 2001 05:57AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Chris Dunn	July 22, 2001 07:48AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	R. Avry Wilson	July 22, 2001 08:09AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	John Wall	July 22, 2001 09:34AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Peter Thomson	July 22, 2001 11:45AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Chris Dunn	July 22, 2001 01:30PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Peter Thomson	July 22, 2001 02:10PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Chris Dunn	July 22, 2001 03:19PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Anthony	July 22, 2001 01:35PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Litz	July 22, 2001 02:01PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	sandy	July 22, 2001 04:22PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Litz	July 22, 2001 04:35PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	sandy	July 22, 2001 04:49PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Anthony	July 22, 2001 05:48PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	sandy	July 22, 2001 06:29PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Anthony	July 22, 2001 06:37PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	sandy	July 22, 2001 06:45PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Anthony	July 22, 2001 08:26PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	sandy	July 22, 2001 08:38PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Frank Doernenburg	July 23, 2001 02:47AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Litz	July 23, 2001 07:00AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Anthony	July 23, 2001 07:10AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Litz	July 24, 2001 09:48AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	sandy	July 23, 2001 07:51AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Litz	July 24, 2001 09:33AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	sandy	July 24, 2001 11:28AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1	Archae Solenhofen	July 22, 2001 06:29PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1 cont.	Archae Solenhofen	July 22, 2001 06:36PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1	Archae Solenhofen	July 23, 2001 12:36AM
Note error made Miss Morris does not claim advanced chemistry	Archae Solenhofen	July 23, 2001 12:47AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1 (error corrected)	Archae Solenhofen	July 23, 2001 01:51AM
Ms. Morris: Please take note	Anthony	July 23, 2001 06:08AM
Re: Ms. Morris: Please take note	Frank Doernenburg	July 23, 2001 10:49AM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Archae Solenhofen	July 23, 2001 12:24PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Blue	July 26, 2001 05:34PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Katherine	July 26, 2001 06:06PM
Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate	Blue	July 27, 2001 07:09AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login