Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 14, 2024, 4:34 pm UTC    
July 22, 2001 06:29PM
<HTML>Anthony
Large amounts of salt destroy concrete, in time the concrete formation becomes soft and fragments.

I do not believe that shells would behave in the same manner as an aggregate additive to the concrete mix, the shells are brittle and would no give added strength, also they would not act in the same manner as a steel fabric reinforcing.

you asked
>How important is the pressure to the formation of limestone, and what part of Davidovits' recipe would take the place of the pressure?<

My simple answer is, limestone will very likely form without pressure, but the result would be a very soft weak form of limestone. Pressure creates density and density results in inherant strength.

As to what part of Davidovits recipe would replace the pressure aspect, I'm not sure the ancient people would have imediate access to anything that could.

Some might argue baking the blocks(sunbaked). The problem with that is it results in a false cure, this results in rapid shrinkage of the compound(block) and this creates areas of weakness and fractures within the structure.

The molecular bonding that takes place in a lime/cement based substance is not the same as sunbaked mud bricks. If you apply excessive amounts of external heat to a lime/cement substance, you create this false cure, which actually tears appart the molecular bond. Due to the rapid evaporation of the contained water, which results in this rapid shrinkage.</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Margaret Morris July 21, 2001 11:11PM

Help I'm a prisoner in a time warp

Don Holeman July 21, 2001 11:17PM

yes, indeed

Katherine July 22, 2001 12:54AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Bob (trailmarker) July 02, 2002 09:41AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 02:46AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 22, 2001 04:07AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 22, 2001 05:57AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 07:48AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

R. Avry Wilson July 22, 2001 08:09AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

John Wall July 22, 2001 09:34AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Peter Thomson July 22, 2001 11:45AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 01:30PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Peter Thomson July 22, 2001 02:10PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 03:19PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 01:35PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 22, 2001 02:01PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 04:22PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 22, 2001 04:35PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 04:49PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 05:48PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 06:29PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 06:37PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 06:45PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 08:26PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 08:38PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 23, 2001 02:47AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 23, 2001 07:00AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 23, 2001 07:10AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 24, 2001 09:48AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 23, 2001 07:51AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 24, 2001 09:33AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 24, 2001 11:28AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1

Archae Solenhofen July 22, 2001 06:29PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1 cont.

Archae Solenhofen July 22, 2001 06:36PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:36AM

Note error made Miss Morris does not claim advanced chemistry

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:47AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1 (error corrected)

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 01:51AM

Ms. Morris: Please take note

Anthony July 23, 2001 06:08AM

Re: Ms. Morris: Please take note

Frank Doernenburg July 23, 2001 10:49AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:24PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Blue July 26, 2001 05:34PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Katherine July 26, 2001 06:06PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Blue July 27, 2001 07:09AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login