Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 14, 2024, 5:03 am UTC    
Litz
July 22, 2001 04:35PM
<HTML>Hi sandy,
Thanks for the reply... however, it was my understanding that the geopolymer composition being proposed by Davidovits is anything but simple portland without the additives. That is why I asked. I was under the impression that the whole reason behind the word "geopolymer" is because its total chemical composition is such that upon curing it is in essence the same material as what the earth turned into the forms of "rock" that we call limestone, etc. I'm not trying to be evasive or argumentative here... just someone with enough construction and chemistry background to be called "a little knowledge"... you know, the kind that is more block headed and confusing than someone with none at all. ;-)
Litz</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Margaret Morris July 21, 2001 11:11PM

Help I'm a prisoner in a time warp

Don Holeman July 21, 2001 11:17PM

yes, indeed

Katherine July 22, 2001 12:54AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Bob (trailmarker) July 02, 2002 09:41AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 02:46AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 22, 2001 04:07AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 22, 2001 05:57AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 07:48AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

R. Avry Wilson July 22, 2001 08:09AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

John Wall July 22, 2001 09:34AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Peter Thomson July 22, 2001 11:45AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 01:30PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Peter Thomson July 22, 2001 02:10PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 03:19PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 01:35PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 22, 2001 02:01PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 04:22PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 22, 2001 04:35PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 04:49PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 05:48PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 06:29PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 06:37PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 06:45PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 08:26PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 08:38PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 23, 2001 02:47AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 23, 2001 07:00AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 23, 2001 07:10AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 24, 2001 09:48AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 23, 2001 07:51AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 24, 2001 09:33AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 24, 2001 11:28AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1

Archae Solenhofen July 22, 2001 06:29PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1 cont.

Archae Solenhofen July 22, 2001 06:36PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:36AM

Note error made Miss Morris does not claim advanced chemistry

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:47AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1 (error corrected)

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 01:51AM

Ms. Morris: Please take note

Anthony July 23, 2001 06:08AM

Re: Ms. Morris: Please take note

Frank Doernenburg July 23, 2001 10:49AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:24PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Blue July 26, 2001 05:34PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Katherine July 26, 2001 06:06PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Blue July 27, 2001 07:09AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login