Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 14, 2024, 7:16 pm UTC    
July 22, 2001 05:48PM
<HTML>Sandy/Litz:

Good points. You have seen the recipe for geopolymer in previous posts (salt, lime, shells, etc). The shells in the mix would tend to act like iron wire/rods in concrete. However, they would hardly constitute enough strength to hold together a composite of the nature that Sandy is describing.

In actuality, having handled the coral stone from the Coral Castle.... well, let me tell you what happened...

After my last visit to Homestead, I brought back a piece to my office to show my assistant. She picked it up, and her first comment was how light it was (in actuality, it is extremely porous, with some bubbles of almost an inch in diameter all through it). She then commented on how strong it was... nothing like the brittle stone I had described to her... and then she started apologizing profusely as she "accidentally" broke the stone into three pieces with her bare hands.

This is probably a great example of a geopolymer that was formed without pressure, and without a structural assistant like shells or wire.

How important is the pressure to the formation of limestone, and what part of Davidovits' recipe would take the place of the pressure?

Anthony</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Margaret Morris July 21, 2001 11:11PM

Help I'm a prisoner in a time warp

Don Holeman July 21, 2001 11:17PM

yes, indeed

Katherine July 22, 2001 12:54AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Bob (trailmarker) July 02, 2002 09:41AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 02:46AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 22, 2001 04:07AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 22, 2001 05:57AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 07:48AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

R. Avry Wilson July 22, 2001 08:09AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

John Wall July 22, 2001 09:34AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Peter Thomson July 22, 2001 11:45AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 01:30PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Peter Thomson July 22, 2001 02:10PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Chris Dunn July 22, 2001 03:19PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 01:35PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 22, 2001 02:01PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 04:22PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 22, 2001 04:35PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 04:49PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 05:48PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 06:29PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 06:37PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 06:45PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 22, 2001 08:26PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 22, 2001 08:38PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Frank Doernenburg July 23, 2001 02:47AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 23, 2001 07:00AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Anthony July 23, 2001 07:10AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 24, 2001 09:48AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 23, 2001 07:51AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Litz July 24, 2001 09:33AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

sandy July 24, 2001 11:28AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1

Archae Solenhofen July 22, 2001 06:29PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1 cont.

Archae Solenhofen July 22, 2001 06:36PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:36AM

Note error made Miss Morris does not claim advanced chemistry

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:47AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen PART 1 (error corrected)

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 01:51AM

Ms. Morris: Please take note

Anthony July 23, 2001 06:08AM

Re: Ms. Morris: Please take note

Frank Doernenburg July 23, 2001 10:49AM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Archae Solenhofen July 23, 2001 12:24PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Blue July 26, 2001 05:34PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Katherine July 26, 2001 06:06PM

Re: Rebuttal 2: Margaret Morris v Archae Solenhofen - Geopolymer Debate

Blue July 27, 2001 07:09AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login