Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 9:57 pm UTC    
August 08, 2001 05:05AM
<HTML>Derek/Greg:

You have shown absolutely nothing, except that modern day equipment that Ed Leedskalnin did not possess can lift blocks.

If I put up a photograph of a 200 ton, 600 horsepower diesel crane, does that mean that all other theories for pyramid construction are defunct, and it is up to everybody else to prove that their theory is correct, and the 200 ton crane stands as the solution?

Of course not... but that's what you are attempting to do here.

Ed's equipment is rated at the 10 ton range. At the top and maxed out. Yet that was only the AVERAGE size of a stone in the coral castle... and although the PULLEY was rated at 10 tons, it would have required Ed to provide 2.5 tons (about 5 METRIC tonnes) of force to operate it.

You have shown nothing with these photos, except that with modern materials and modern engineering, it MAY be possible for one person to do the work Ed did.

But with HIS cast iron equipment, 70 years ago, it just did not happen.

Plus, there's one other factor.

You are both completely forgetting the fingerprints LEFT by the machine. The fingerprints have been found on nearly every block in the castle. MOST especially on the 30-tonner and the obelisks. There is absolutely NO other explanation for these fingerprints, so they clearly show that either:

a. the technology was used

b. the technology was forged for some wild, unknown reason.

Now, if the technology was known to Ed well enough for him to FORGE the fingerprints, and it works (as Kat has attested to), then why bother using the block & tackle, which make the work a hundred times harder?

Illogical conclusions, gentlemen.

Chariots and Porsches.

Pyramids and diesel cranes.

If you are going to say that Ed's equipment was capable of building the Coral Castle, then YOU are offering this as your theory of how it was accomplished. If you are not willing to PROVE that it was how Ed did it, by calculating HIS equipment's capacities, then please retract your statement and remove from people's minds the idea that any of this is even remotely possible.

Because, in all honesty and with my word as a gentleman, it is not.

The onus is on you. Prove or Retract your theory.

Anthony</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Hand operated chain hoists. Was Coral Castle.

Derek Barnett August 07, 2001 04:06PM

Ed Story #1

KatDawg August 07, 2001 04:25PM

Ed Story #2

KatDawg August 07, 2001 04:27PM

Re: Ed Story #2

Anthony August 07, 2001 05:07PM

Re: Ed Story #2

Greg Reeder August 07, 2001 05:15PM

Greg

Anthony August 08, 2001 05:25AM

Re: Greg

jameske August 08, 2001 09:12AM

Re: Greg

jameske August 08, 2001 09:22AM

Re:NOT in the BOX?

Greg Reeder August 08, 2001 10:04AM

If it walk like a hoist and quack like a hoist

D.Przezdziecki August 07, 2001 06:07PM

Re: Ed Story #2

penny August 07, 2001 08:00PM

A thought for Penny

Anthony August 08, 2001 05:19AM

Re: A thought for Penny

penny August 08, 2001 07:08PM

Re: Hand operated chain hoists. Was Coral Castle.

Litz August 07, 2001 04:28PM

Re: Hand operated chain hoists. Was Coral Castle.

Derek Barnett August 07, 2001 04:40PM

Re: Hand operated chain hoists. Was Coral Castle.

Greg Reeder August 07, 2001 04:39PM

Re: Hand operated chain hoists. Was Coral Castle.

Katherine Reece August 07, 2001 04:52PM

Specs

Anthony August 07, 2001 04:55PM

Specs, some people could use a pair.

Derek Barnett August 07, 2001 05:23PM

Re: Specs, some people could use a pair.

Anthony August 07, 2001 10:00PM

Re: Specs, some people could use a pair.

Derek Barnett August 08, 2001 01:53AM

Re: Specs, some people could use a pair.

Greg Reeder August 08, 2001 01:56AM

Burden of proof

Anthony August 08, 2001 05:05AM

Re: Burden of proof

D.Przezdziecki August 08, 2001 06:38AM

Re: Burden of proof

jameske August 08, 2001 07:27AM

Missing the Big Picture

Tman August 08, 2001 09:34AM

Re: Missing the Big Picture

jameske August 08, 2001 09:39AM

Re: Missing the Big Picture

Greg Reeder August 08, 2001 09:45AM

Re: Missing the Big Picture

Tman August 08, 2001 09:56AM

Greg is correct here

Anthony August 08, 2001 10:57AM

The B word.

Derek Barnett August 08, 2001 12:28PM

Re: The B word.

Anthony August 08, 2001 12:42PM

Re: The B word.

Greg Reeder August 08, 2001 12:53PM

Blah, blah, blah.

Derek Barnett August 08, 2001 01:06PM

Ed Story #3

KatDawg August 08, 2001 09:51AM

Re: Ed Story #3

D.Przezdziecki August 08, 2001 10:21AM

Re: Ed Story #3

Tman August 08, 2001 10:26AM

Re: Ed Story #3

D.Przezdziecki August 08, 2001 10:56AM

Ed's horizontal movement

Anthony August 08, 2001 11:01AM

Re: Ed Story #3

Anthony August 08, 2001 10:58AM

Re: Ed Story #3

KatDawg August 08, 2001 11:17AM

Re: Ed Story #3

Tman August 08, 2001 11:47AM

The Mystery of the 9 Ton Gate

Anthony August 08, 2001 12:35PM

Re: The Mystery of the 9 Ton Gate

Greg Reeder August 08, 2001 12:57PM

Re: The Mystery of the 9 Ton Gate

Tman August 08, 2001 02:13PM

Re: Ed Story #3

Anthony August 08, 2001 12:28PM

Occam's Razor Applications

Anthony August 08, 2001 12:27PM

Re: Occam's Razor Applications

Greg Reeder August 08, 2001 12:50PM

Ed Story #4

KatDawg August 08, 2001 02:19PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login