Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 19, 2024, 6:30 pm UTC    
September 14, 2004 03:20PM
This email I had with a forensic anthropologist kind of addresses the issue:

----- Original Message -----
From: George W. Gill
To: Jaime Pretell
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: Forensic Anthropology and Race


Dear Jaime,



In forensic anthropology we are surprisingly accurate in identifying individuals of mixed ancestry. Most Hispanics are in this category (in the American Southwest they show a blend of S. European trait and Mesoamerican). Since we have at least as many traits on the skeleton to use for the identification of ancestry as we do on the soft tissues, I am personally more accurate with the i.d. of skeletons than if I am telling ancestry when looking at a living person. We do this by assessing the percentage of traits on the skeleton that are characteristic of the particular ancestral populations. As you know African Americans have, on average, a fair amount of N. W. European ancestry which will show up just as well on skeletons as with the soft tissue traits (skin color, hair form, etc.). Regarding your question about the correlation of skeletal traits with such things as nose form, lips, skin color, etc. it actually varies. Nose form can be readily discerned from the skeleton, lip form and projection somewhat, and skin color not at all. But nearly all people who show a lot of sub-Saharan African trait skeletally will also be dark skinned, so we can make educated guesses on those traits as well. I hope that I have helped answer a few of your questions about this fascinating topic.



Best regards,



George W. Gill, Ph.D.

University of Wyoming



-----Original Message-----
From: Jaime Pretell [mailto:jaime_pretell@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 11:58 AM
To: George W. Gill
Subject: Forensic Anthropology and Race



I always find it interesting to read your articles. I happen to be a "race" denier, but I see where you are coming from. I am curious how accurate Forensic Anthropology is with "Mixed" populations. I am also curious what features can and cannot be determined by Forensic Anthropology and what is more guesswork. For example, can you determine lip shape skin color or nose shape? I am also interested in Comparisons between African populations and the many indigenous populations that seem to be similar to Africans.

Sincerely,

Jaime Andres Pretell

Subject Author Posted

"We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

AWSX September 07, 2004 07:43AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Mercury Rapids September 07, 2004 07:44AM

Thanks Merc! n/t

AWSX September 07, 2004 07:48AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Roxana Cooper September 07, 2004 08:50AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

teacup September 07, 2004 09:54AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

donald raab September 07, 2004 11:15AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

DougWeller September 07, 2004 02:52PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

donald raab September 07, 2004 04:52PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 08, 2004 01:24AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Roxana Cooper September 07, 2004 04:19PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

donald raab September 07, 2004 04:42PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Roxana Cooper September 08, 2004 07:55PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 08, 2004 01:14AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Roxana September 08, 2004 04:10PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 08, 2004 08:24PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Roxana Cooper September 09, 2004 08:55AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 09, 2004 01:00PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Salsassin September 14, 2004 07:30AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Pete Clarke September 14, 2004 07:46AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 14, 2004 02:49PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Salsassin September 14, 2004 03:20PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Pete Clarke September 15, 2004 04:03AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

DougWeller September 15, 2004 11:20AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 16, 2004 10:19AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Salsassin September 16, 2004 11:42AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 16, 2004 08:01PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

DougWeller September 16, 2004 11:36PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Salsassin September 14, 2004 07:33AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 20, 2004 02:19PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Salsassin September 20, 2004 03:01PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 20, 2004 03:19PM

And yet ........

Katherine Reece September 07, 2004 11:43AM

Re: And yet ........

kenuchelover September 08, 2004 01:41AM

She is changing her tune.....

kenuchelover September 07, 2004 08:28PM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

Salsassin September 14, 2004 07:21AM

Re: "We have extracted her DNA. It is going to be a bomb."

kenuchelover September 20, 2004 02:12PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login