donald raab Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Look at the geography and the route.
>
> FROM Austrailia to Japan and then around the loop
> to the other end in Chile.
>
> Even the most OT alternative thinker hasn't
> visited this scenario.
>
> For Roxane and For the orthodox side of the house
> any of the below would give heartburn but all of
> them?
>
> 1. Very early (Terra Del Fuego) possibly as early
> as 45k
> 2. From south to north

How do you get south to north? And if the Pendejo dates are right, they would support north to south anyway.

> 3. Not clovis

Of course not. One of the 'orthodox' positions, once a minority I'll admit, has for decades been that there is no 'Clovis barrier'.

> 4. Planned diffusion (not your fall off a log
> type)

Where do you get this from?

> 5. Open water transit very early.

A coastal Pacific migration route is possible," Gonzalez said.

> 6. Aborigine or Negroid population group.
?
“They appear more similar to southern Asians and the populations of the Pacific Rim than they do to northern Asians,” she said.
>
> What really interests me is WHY the dispora. What
> was the motivation for such movements so early.

People have always been moving. To call it a 'dispora' (sic) is making assumptions without evidence.

I'm not impressed with the skull studies.

Doug