| May 27, 2024, 4:10 pm UTC |
 |
| In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic |
| Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In |
|
Ancient History •
Ancient Egypt •
Laboratory •
Humanities •
Apocalypse •
Paper Lens •
Coffee Shop Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology |
| July 31, 2001 07:14PM |
<HTML>Dave,
You'll do better consulting their books.
As far as I'm concerned, I don't buy the idea that 10.5kBCE was being astronomically pointed out by the AE's. (As an aside, neither do I agree with the diffusionist Atlantian version of it, nor do I buy the Cayce connection. All three are seperate issues, and I have different reason for not supporting each of them).
My own theory deals with a different epoch, which I humbly decline to announce on the internet. I'm just glad to see others finding the epoch on their own; it was only a matter of time, and I suspect other people will eventually be led to what ever else lies 'hidden' in the monuments and texts of the AE's.
Avry</HTML>
You'll do better consulting their books.
As far as I'm concerned, I don't buy the idea that 10.5kBCE was being astronomically pointed out by the AE's. (As an aside, neither do I agree with the diffusionist Atlantian version of it, nor do I buy the Cayce connection. All three are seperate issues, and I have different reason for not supporting each of them).
My own theory deals with a different epoch, which I humbly decline to announce on the internet. I'm just glad to see others finding the epoch on their own; it was only a matter of time, and I suspect other people will eventually be led to what ever else lies 'hidden' in the monuments and texts of the AE's.
Avry</HTML>
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.