<HTML>RAW wrote:
>
> Good then. Glad you all like this later date.
> Congratulations.
>
> c. early 9th Millenium in the basis for <I>my</I> theory.
>
> Hehehe, right back at you.
>
> Avry
> ps. Thank you for bringing to everyone's attention, Mr Moore.
> I appreciate the free publicity!
So the question is now this. Given that the Sun was in modern Leo a couple of thousand years earlier than Hancock/Bauval would have us believe, and given that they (the AEs) didn't recognise a Leo constellation in that part of the sky, then what is the point of their Leo=Sphinx association?
Best Regards,
Dave
P.S. call me Dave please.</HTML>
