Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 27, 2024, 5:31 am UTC    
July 31, 2001 09:07AM
<HTML>Bryan wrote:
>
> Bent, in his original post, said:
>
> >>I submit that the sun' position was at vernal equinox in
> 10450 B.C. was 13hrs 32m. <b>I further submit that the epoch
> for the position Tony has given is 8450 B.C, not 10450
> B.C..</b> [my emphasis]

13hrs 32m is on the western side of Virgo, not too far away from Spica, IIRC. I'll check up tonight on it, but Leo would easily been visible in its entirety well before dawn, but would have been well to the south, nowhere near the risiing Sun.

Best Regards,
Dave</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

more on Leo and Virgo

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 08:28AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

John Wall July 31, 2001 08:29AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

Bryan July 31, 2001 08:35AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

John Wall July 31, 2001 08:38AM

Industrial strength corset required...

Bryan July 31, 2001 08:43AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

Bryan July 31, 2001 08:44AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

John Wall July 31, 2001 08:48AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

Bryan July 31, 2001 09:18AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

John Wall July 31, 2001 09:19AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 09:07AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

Mikey Brass July 31, 2001 09:37AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

Mikey Brass July 31, 2001 09:35AM

Re: more on Leo and Virgo

RAW July 31, 2001 02:08PM

A new question for us all

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 04:47PM

Re: A new question for us all

RAW July 31, 2001 07:14PM

Re: A new question for us all

Dave Moore August 01, 2001 02:47AM

Re: A new question for us all

RAW August 01, 2001 10:11AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login