Karen ,

The long distance "alignments " are fictitious ,they are to be expected by chance,and as you have discovered the whole thing collapses when it is realised that continuing a bearing over great distances doesn't actually lead to the places suggested by GE , which is the method used by the joiner uppers .
The Mace /club when measured through the centre is off by 38 miles . That one small page of text on the Cerrne Abbas giant was full of errors and fantasy .
Similar problems are guaranteed to be found with the others .
Maybe there has been a problem with the translation but when astronomical terminology is used it turns out to be gobbleydook . i.e .did you google "“declination of the earths axis “ ? Find anything , ,? it's not surprising ." the sun at its zenith when it reaches the solstice culminations, at the spring and autumnal equinoxes; in the southern hemisphere on September 23rd and March 21st. " is another ,it's a confusion of terms and makes no sense .

> The prehistoric buildings with alignments are far
> from "random" , they are often the most obvious /
> biggest with a clear indications of the the
> alignment ,which also indicates intentionality .

Is something entirely different and can be shown to be the case .
You didn't supply a couple of sites where I could show you exactly the same type of stuff as claimed by the joiner uppers .
"you also denied that the solar azimuth at the solstice is 89.33 degrees.."
That is not what I said and is pretty meaningless as it stands , it would have been easier .
and more accurate to have quoted me .
What I said was "The azimuth summer solstice sunrise at Machu Pichu isn't 89.334 ," That is the case .The sun rises at about that azimuth theree months either side of the solstice ,it's basic astronomy .

George