Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vague?
>
> 1) The claim has been made the plane was meant to
> crash there...
>
> 2) I said reading the actual recordings indicate
> that was not the plan, the hijackers decided to
> prang there when they lost control of the outer
> cabin and were close to losing control inside the
> cockpit
>
> 3) I stated it is clear from the actual recordings
> crashing 5 minutes earlier is clearly discussed...
>
>
> The ACTUAL recorded words are being ignored to
> spread a theory of Global Conspiracy revolving
> around a STAR...
>
> And I am called vague... I have tried to be as
> plain as I can with my doubts,
> perhaps the volume on your celestial sphere music
> is turned to a point you no longer hear these
> doubts?
>
> Jammer


Basically i wanted to know exactly what part of his logic was flawed you were referring to,
i couldnt tell what exacty you referring to. eg Was it all statements regarding 2nd coming of jesus, or was it just some partial logic flawed.

Heres your statement mentioning you dont see oggys logic.
> I just don't see Oggy's logic...

Now with your recent post you mention
"1) The claim has been made the plane was meant to crash there "

So your comment is referring intention to crash there, this clearly was my theory
and my claim and yet you referring it to Oggys logic ?
I think we can see now you were in error as well jammer by referring it to Oggys logic,
clearly if that was your intention, you should of type "clemente logic" in your statement and not oggys logic.



ciao clemente