Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HOW could those ancient sculptors ignore PHI
> (1.618) for the sake of simple King Worship in
> accuracy?
>
>
>
> The ratio of the eye spread to total face width is
> WRONG (1.77 instead of 1.6180339887)!
>
> Had they NO respect of the mathematical secrets
> they were to encode in everything?
>
> Or is it possible they served a higher purpose,
> giving praise to the king regardless of his facial
> ratios?
>
> Might that mean culturally they had an entire set
> of command instructions to meet that had nothing
> whatever to do with math codes?
>

Jammer-Please, please, don't tell me you don't see the fallacy in this? Okay I'll tell you, this is the "broken statue fallacy" this happens when a debunker takes a fragment of a statue and doesn't find the secret messages encoded in it. And then incorrectly says they've debunked the number crunchers. That's because the statue is broken. If you had the complete statue you would indeed find that it held the secrets of phi, pi, 'i', the solution to fermat's last theorem, along with the solution to the Reyman Hypothesis, along with the launch codes to he nuclear missile armory, and the missing parts of the Watergate tape that were deleted by Rosemary Woods. HTH.