sansahansan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
astronomers to be considered for
> your theory?
> > Request for clarification: Leibner was born in
> Saxony. Newton in Lincolnshire. Using
> approximations from wiki for their respective
> birth locations, I see Newton at 52.48.38 N,
> 0.37.47W, and Liebner at 61.1.37N and 13.21.32E.
>
> With the GP at 31.131N, 29.97E, it would appear
> that Liebner was closest to the pyramids.
> So please explain your comment: "Also Newton being
> from England was in a region of latitude that
> related to pyramid slopes."

The slope of Khufu's pyramid is 52 some odd degrees. Obviously Lincolnshire, England was created originally as a reference to the largest surviving pyramid in Egypt.

Can it get more lame?

>
> Request for clarification: You appear to have used
> Dec 25, 1942 for Newtons birth. Wiki lists it as
> 1943, and further clarifies that it is an assigned
> date of birth as England did not use the Gregorian
> Calendar at that time. Why use Dec 25 instead of
> the adjusted date from the original calendar in
> use at the time of his birth? Why the year
> discrepancy? Why does the image you used in the
> OP show Jan 4 1943?
>
> Request for clarification: You list Newton at
> 32.6018. Then you list Liebner at 32.584.
> Given a less than 2 year difference in their
> birthdays (btw: how close do you come to sqrt(2)
> when you convert that difference into years?),
> does the star wonder that much from year to year?
> If so, then how can you accurately project
> backwards in time to the specific year of Jesus
> and the specific year in which to take a reading
> on the slope of the pyramid to point at the star?
>
>
> In truth, it's not your answers I'm interested in
> (though I'd be glad to see them)... It's the way
> you answer them that I will find fascinating.
>
>
>
>




Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.