Ogygos Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Khazar-khum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > But what about Leibniz?
>
> Polaris altitude at Giza during his birth is
> 32.584 degrees. Not as good at Newton. The error
> here is 0.016 degrees.Leibniz was a mathematician
> and philosopher but not an astronomer. Also Newton
> being from England was in a region of latitude
> that related to pyramid slopes.
>
> Another person we can mention is the Dane
> astronomer Ole Christensen Rømer. He is known for
> being the first person to measure the speed of
> light. His Polaris angle is 32.5933 degrees. Error
> 0.0067 degrees.
>
>
> PERIODOS PERIPhORAS GES(Earth revolution period) =
> 1913
>
>
>
> Edited 1 times. Last edit at 08/12/10 11:02PM by
> Ogygos.


Fascinating. Not your data or theory or flimsy conclusions, but the formation of your theory itself is utterly fascinating.

Query: Of the ten scientists that came up on your list that you cite from google, what are their polaris angles and margins of error and their location at time of birth?

Query: What were your google search terms that resulted in that list with Newton as the first?

Query: Are only astronomers to be considered for your theory?

Request for clarification: Leibner was born in Saxony. Newton in Lincolnshire. Using approximations from wiki for their respective birth locations, I see Newton at 52.48.38 N, 0.37.47W, and Liebner at 61.1.37N and 13.21.32E.

With the GP at 31.131N, 29.97E, it would appear that Liebner was closest to the pyramids.
So please explain your comment: "Also Newton being from England was in a region of latitude that related to pyramid slopes."

Request for clarification: You appear to have used Dec 25, 1942 for Newtons birth. Wiki lists it as 1943, and further clarifies that it is an assigned date of birth as England did not use the Gregorian Calendar at that time. Why use Dec 25 instead of the adjusted date from the original calendar in use at the time of his birth? Why the year discrepancy? Why does the image you used in the OP show Jan 4 1943?

Request for clarification: You list Newton at 32.6018. Then you list Liebner at 32.584.
Given a less than 2 year difference in their birthdays (btw: how close do you come to sqrt(2) when you convert that difference into years?), does the star wonder that much from year to year? If so, then how can you accurately project backwards in time to the specific year of Jesus and the specific year in which to take a reading on the slope of the pyramid to point at the star?


In truth, it's not your answers I'm interested in (though I'd be glad to see them)... It's the way you answer them that I will find fascinating.